Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

Enhancing Scalability of Metric Differential Privacy via Secret Dataset Partitioning and Benders Decomposition

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Metric Differential Privacy at the User-Level Via the Earth Mover's Distance

Wasserstein Differential Privacy

Metric-based local differential privacy for statistical applications

Enhancing Sparse Mobile CrowdSensing With Manifold Optimization and Differential Privacy

Scalable Differential Privacy Mechanisms for Real-Time Machine Learning Applications

Distributed empirical risk minimization with differential privacy

Bounded and Unbiased Composite Differential Privacy

Differential Privacy in Privacy-Preserving Big Data and Learning: Challenge and Opportunity

Customized Local Differential Privacy for Multi-Agent Distributed Optimization

Improving Parameter Estimation and Defensive Ability of Latent Dirichlet Allocation Model Training under Rényi Differential Privacy

Differentially Private Spatial Decompositions

Metric geometry of the privacy-utility tradeoff

Dynamic Differential-Privacy Preserving SGD

Deciphering the Interplay between Local Differential Privacy, Average Bayesian Privacy, and Maximum Bayesian Privacy

Enhancing Feature-Specific Data Protection via Bayesian Coordinate Differential Privacy

Breaking the Communication-Privacy-Accuracy Tradeoff with F-Differential Privacy

Differentially private data release through multidimensional partitioning

Privacy accounting $\varepsilon$conomics: Improving differential privacy composition via a posteriori bounds

Mind the Privacy Unit! User-Level Differential Privacy for Language Model Fine-Tuning