Abstract:Recently, the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) indicate a potential deviation from the standard $\Lambda$CDM model. Some studies suggest that the data points from the luminous red galaxies (LRG) survey in DESI BAO data may contribute to this discrepancy. In this work, our main goal is to investigate whether this deviation is caused by the parameterization of the equation of state (EoS) of dark energy (DE). Hence, we have examined four popular parameterized dark energy models in our analysis: the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL), Barboza-Alcaniz (BA), Jassal-Bagla-Padmanabhan (JBP), and Feng-Shen-Li-Li (FSLL) parameterizations. Considering that LRG1 and LRG2 data points may lead to deviation from the $\Lambda$CDM model, we use two versions of DESI BAO data, differing in whether these data points are included. Additionally, to break the parameter degeneracies and obtain robust constraint results, we introduce Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) and quasars (QSO) in our analysis. Our findings indicate that in these parameterizations, the deviation from ($w_0$,$w_{1}$)=(-1,0) becomes more pronounced when using the combined data from DESI BAO, SNe Ia, and QSO compilations. Here, $w_{0}$ and $w_{1}$ represent the EoS of DE. It suggests that the parameterizations of the EoS of DE have little impact on the deviation from the $\Lambda$CDM model. Besides, our analysis potentially hints that dark energy may have dynamic properties. In addition, the results obtained from different BAO datasets demonstrate that the LRG1 and LRG2 data points do indeed contribute to a deviation from the $\Lambda$CDM model. Finally, according to the statistical criteria, the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), the joint constraints provide substantial observational support to the BA and FSLL models.

MEET-U Project I: The key drivers of the preference for dynamic dark energy

Robust Preference for Dynamical Dark Energy in DESI BAO and SN Measurements

Uniting the Observed Dynamical Dark Energy Preference with the Discrepancies in $Ω_m$ and $H_0$ Across Cosmological Probes

A preference for dynamical phantom dark energy using one-parameter model with Planck, DESI DR1 BAO and SN data

Quantifying Scalar Field Dynamics with DESI 2024 Y1 BAO measurements

On the evidence of dynamical dark energy

Dynamical dark energy in the light of DESI 2024 data

Cosmological constraints on dark energy models using DESI BAO 2024

Investigating Late-Time Dark Energy and Massive Neutrinos in Light of DESI Y1 BAO

Revisiting holographic dark energy after DESI 2024

Impact of LRG1 and LRG2 in DESI 2024 BAO data on dark energy evolution

Constraints on Interacting Dark Energy Models from the DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation and DES Supernovae Data

Probing Dark Energy Evolution Post-DESI 2024

Dynamical Dark Energy Beyond Planck? Constraints from multiple CMB probes, DESI BAO and Type-Ia Supernovae

DESI 2024: Constraints on Physics-Focused Aspects of Dark Energy using DESI DR1 BAO Data

Implications of DES 5YR SNe Dataset for $Λ$CDM

DESI Constraints on Exponential Quintessence

Interpreting DESI 2024 BAO: late-time dynamical dark energy or a local effect?

Dynamical dark energy in light of cosmic distance measurements I: a demonstration using simulated datasets