Abstract:Recently, the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) indicate a potential deviation from the standard $\Lambda$CDM model. Some studies suggest that the data points from the luminous red galaxies (LRG) survey in DESI BAO data may contribute to this discrepancy. In this work, our main goal is to investigate whether this deviation is caused by the parameterization of the equation of state (EoS) of dark energy (DE). Hence, we have examined four popular parameterized dark energy models in our analysis: the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL), Barboza-Alcaniz (BA), Jassal-Bagla-Padmanabhan (JBP), and Feng-Shen-Li-Li (FSLL) parameterizations. Considering that LRG1 and LRG2 data points may lead to deviation from the $\Lambda$CDM model, we use two versions of DESI BAO data, differing in whether these data points are included. Additionally, to break the parameter degeneracies and obtain robust constraint results, we introduce Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) and quasars (QSO) in our analysis. Our findings indicate that in these parameterizations, the deviation from ($w_0$,$w_{1}$)=(-1,0) becomes more pronounced when using the combined data from DESI BAO, SNe Ia, and QSO compilations. Here, $w_{0}$ and $w_{1}$ represent the EoS of DE. It suggests that the parameterizations of the EoS of DE have little impact on the deviation from the $\Lambda$CDM model. Besides, our analysis potentially hints that dark energy may have dynamic properties. In addition, the results obtained from different BAO datasets demonstrate that the LRG1 and LRG2 data points do indeed contribute to a deviation from the $\Lambda$CDM model. Finally, according to the statistical criteria, the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), the joint constraints provide substantial observational support to the BA and FSLL models.

DESI Constraints on Exponential Quintessence

Consistent Theories for the DESI dark energy fit

Robust Preference for Dynamical Dark Energy in DESI BAO and SN Measurements

Dynamical dark energy in the light of DESI 2024 data

The Self-Consistency of DESI Analysis and Comment on "Does DESI 2024 Confirm $Λ$CDM?"

Does dark energy really revive using DESI 2024 data?

Dark energy in light of recent DESI BAO and Hubble tension

Quantifying Scalar Field Dynamics with DESI 2024 Y1 BAO measurements

Quintom cosmology and modified gravity after DESI 2024

Quintessential interpretation of the evolving dark energy in light of DESI observations

Interpreting DESI's evidence for evolving dark energy

Quintessential interpretation of the evolving dark energy in light of DESI

Modified gravity interpretation of the evolving dark energy in light of DESI data

Tightening the reins on non-minimal dark sector physics: Interacting Dark Energy with dynamical and non-dynamical equation of state

Cosmological constraints on dark energy models using DESI BAO 2024

Fitting the DESI BAO Data with Dark Energy Driven by the Cohen-Kaplan-Nelson Bound

Revisiting holographic dark energy after DESI 2024

A preference for dynamical phantom dark energy using one-parameter model with Planck, DESI DR1 BAO and SN data

DESI 2024: Constraints on Physics-Focused Aspects of Dark Energy using DESI DR1 BAO Data