Large Effects of Small Cues: Priming Selfish Economic Decisions

Avichai Snir,Dudi Levy,Dian Wang,Haipeng Allan Chen,Daniel Levy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32166.74566

2024-05-07

Abstract:Many experimental studies report that economics students tend to act more selfishly than students of other disciplines, a finding that received widespread public and professional attention. Two main explanations that the existing literature offers for the differences found in the behavior between economists and noneconomists are the selection effect, and the indoctrination effect. We offer an alternative, novel explanation. We argue that these differences can be explained by differences in the interpretation of the context. We test this hypothesis by conducting two social dilemma experiments in the US and Israel with participants from both economics and non-economics majors. In the experiments, participants face a tradeoff between profit maximization, that is the market norm and workers welfare, that is the social norm. We use priming to manipulate the cues that the participants receive before they make their decision. We find that when participants receive cues signaling that the decision has an economic context, both economics and non-economics students tend to maximize profits. When the participants receive cues emphasizing social norms, on the other hand, both economics and non-economics students are less likely to maximize profits. We conclude that some of the differences found between the decisions of economics and non-economics students can be explained by contextual cues.

General Economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper discusses the more selfish behavior exhibited by economics students compared to students in other disciplines when making decisions, and whether this is explained by their professional background or environment. Currently, there are two main explanations: self-selection effect and indoctrination effect. The paper proposes a new perspective, suggesting that this difference may be caused by different interpretations of the situations. Through two social dilemma experiments conducted in the United States and Israel, the researchers manipulated the clues received by participants and found that when participants received hints indicating an economic background, both economics and non-economics students tended to maximize profits; whereas when the clues emphasized social norms, they were less likely to pursue maximum profit. Therefore, the decision-making differences between some economics and non-economics students may be attributed to situational cues rather than stable personality traits.