Abstract:The notion that human scale inertial mass and the various forms of tangible energy, like kinetic, heat, light, chemical, gravity, etc., have some kind of equivalence; existed since the time of Isaac Newton. Historically, based purely on epistemological and phenomenological perspective, there has been speculative, theoretical, and experimental attempts based on electrostatic, electrodynamic and relativistic, etc., consideration to deduce a quantitative relation between mass and energy. By the turn of 20th century, a vastly oversimplified and wrongly derived relation ΔE = Δmc2, where E is energy, m inertial mass, and c the velocity of light; has been unjustly attributed to Albert Einstein. This relation presumed to be universally valid for all forms of inertial mass and energy, but without valid evidence, along with the physically and mathematically invalid arbitrary derivation by Einstein; have enjoyed acceptance and is veneration by official science for more than hundred years and still continue. Einstein’s false mass-energy formulation, seems to be due to the unfortunate combination of a number of factor: 1) epistemological misunderstanding; 2) the ill effects of the use of unscientific axiomatic truth of the universal constancy of the (zero-mass) light velocity c, that has given rise to unphysical objects, concepts and notions of reality; 3) workings of (even if unended) mathematical tricks; and 4) most of all, as implied in the mass-energy equation, the wrong conception that the kinetic motion of any object leads to the increase of its inertial mass by the Lorentz gamma factor. All these combined in a negative way to result in the irrational replacement of the velocity v of classical kinetic energy equation with relativistic c. The falsity of the claim of relativistic mass-energy relation would be clear from recent reports that one can derive Einstein’s mass-energy equation from Newtonian mechanics alone, simply by using the wrong concept of relativistic mass increase, instead of a constant inertial mass of classical mechanics. All the concerns about Einstein’s formulation of the mass-energy relation, raise serious doubt about its scientific validity. A more comprehensive ontological approach based on an understanding of the origin of matter and motion in their elementary form, seems to be imperative, to settle the issue of mass-energy relation. Hegel’s philosophy of space and time and his dialectical ontology of the origin of matter and motion, now realized through quantum-dialectics, offers such a paradigm for a scientific and rational derivation of the mass-energy relation.

Mass-energy equivalence and the gravitational redshift: Does energy always have mass?

Inertia, Gravity and the Meaning of Mass

Mass-energy equivalence in wave–particle duality of light: Integrated quantum and classical mechanics

What is the gravitational mass when energy and inertial mass are not equivalent?

New Physics II – Quantum-Dialectical Derivation of New Mass-Energy Relation Invalidates Einstein’s Famous Equation E = mc2

On the analogies between gravitational and electromagnetic radiative energy

Inequivalence between gravitational mass and energy due to quantum effects at microscopic and macroscopic levels

Equivalence between electromagnetic self-energy and self-mass

On the Electromagnetic Mass Dilemma

Breakdown of the Equivalence between Gravitational Mass and Energy for a Quantum Body: Theory and Suggested Experiments

Breakdown of the Einstein's Equivalence Principle for a quantum body

Positive rational solutions to $x^y = y^{mx}$: a number-theoretic excursion

Can the Abraham Light Momentum and Energy in a Medium Constitute a Lorentz Four-Vector?

Mass density vs. energy density at cosmological scales

The Origin of Electromagnetic Mass (Electromagnetic Inertia)

Gravitational redshift revisited: inertia, geometry, and charge

On the gravitational energy problem and the energy of photons

Does $E=mc^2$ Require Relativity?

Update on an Electromagnetic Basis for Inertia, Gravitation, the Principle of Equivalence, Spin and Particle Mass Ratios

Do gravitational waves carry energy-momentum? A reappraisal

The Lorentz Transformation for Photons in Dispersive Media and in Gravitational Fields