Abstract:Quantum state transfer protocols are a major toolkit in many quantum information processing tasks, from quantum key distribution to quantum computation. To assess performance of a such a protocol, one often relies on the average fidelity between the input and the output states. Going beyond this scheme, we analyze the entire probability distribution of fidelity, providing a general framework to derive it for the transfer of single- and two-qubit states. Starting from the delta-like shape of the fidelity distribution, characteristic to perfect transfer, we analyze its broadening and deformation due to realistic features of the process, including non-perfect read-out timing. Different models of quantum transfer, sharing the same value of the average fidelity, display different distributions of fidelity, providing thus additional information on the protocol, including the minimum fidelity.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is that in the quantum state transfer protocol, relying solely on the average fidelity cannot fully characterize the transfer process. Specifically, the authors analyzed the entire probability distribution of the fidelity and provided a general framework to derive the fidelity distributions for single - and two - qubit state transfers. By studying the changes in the fidelity distribution, more information about the transfer protocol can be obtained, including details such as the minimum fidelity, which are very important when evaluating the actual performance of different protocols. ### Background of the Paper and Problem Definition The quantum state transfer protocol is an important tool in many quantum information processing tasks, and it is indispensable from quantum key distribution to quantum computing. To evaluate the performance of a protocol, the average fidelity between the input and output states is usually relied on. However, the average fidelity cannot fully describe all the features of the transfer process, especially when there are non - ideal conditions, such as imprecise read - out times. ### Main Contributions 1. **Analysis of Fidelity Distribution**: - The authors went beyond the traditional average - fidelity method and analyzed the complete probability distribution of the fidelity. - A general framework was provided to derive the fidelity distributions for single - and two - qubit state transfers. 2. **Comparison of Different Models**: - The differences in the fidelity distributions of different quantum transfer models under the same average fidelity were studied. - By analyzing these distributions, more information about the protocol performance can be obtained, including the minimum fidelity. ### Specific Methods 1. **Calculation of Fidelity Distribution**: - For a given protocol, the fidelity can be calculated through the functional relationship of state parameters. - Using these functional relationships, the probability distribution function (PDF) of the fidelity was derived. 2. **General Transfer - Mapping Method**: - Consider a general network system where each node carries a \(d\)-level system. - Through the Kraus representation, the pure input state of the sender was associated with the state of the receiver to calculate the fidelity. ### Experiments and Results 1. **Analysis of Specific Cases**: - A single - qubit and two - qubit transfer protocols were analyzed in detail. - For the two - qubit case, the fidelity distribution of the state with a fixed entanglement value was derived. 2. **Comparison of Different Protocols**: - The fidelity distributions of the weak - coupling method (W), the barrier protocol (B), and the perfect - transfer protocol (P) were compared. - Through diagrams and numerical simulations, the performance differences of different protocols under non - ideal conditions were shown. ### Conclusion By analyzing the complete probability distribution of the fidelity, the performance of the quantum state transfer protocol can be more comprehensively evaluated, especially when there are non - ideal conditions. This method not only provides more information than the average fidelity but also can help optimize and improve existing transfer protocols.

Distribution of Fidelity in Quantum State Transfer Protocols

A Lower Bound on the Fidelity Between Two States in Terms of Their Bures Distance

Direct Fidelity Estimation for Generic Quantum States

Multivariate Fidelities

Versatile fidelity estimation with confidence

Optimal fidelity estimation for density matrix

Fidelity estimation of quantum states on a silicon photonic chip

A Quantum Tanimoto Coefficient Fidelity for Entanglement Measurement

Optimal Fidelity Estimation from Binary Measurements for Discrete and Continuous Variable Systems

A new fidelity of quantum channel evolution and its geometric interpretation

An Alternative Quantum Fidelity for Mixed States of Qudits

Theory of versatile fidelity estimation with confidence

FENDI: Toward High-Fidelity Entanglement Distribution in the Quantum Internet

Fidelity Estimation of Entangled Measurements with Local States

A new volatility term in the theory of options with transaction costs

Fidelity-dissipation relations in quantum gates

Fidelity of Single Qubit Maps

Nonlinearity of the Fidelity in Open Qudit Systems: Gate and Noise Dependence in High-dimensional Quantum Computing

Bures fidelity of displaced squeezed thermal states

Fidelity and Metrics of Quantum States

Fidelity and Entanglement of Random Bipartite Pure States: Insights and Applications