Bike network planning in limited urban space

Nina Wiedemann,Christian Nöbel,Henry Martin,Lukas Ballo,Martin Raubal

2024-05-03

Abstract:The lack of cycling infrastructure in urban environments hinders the adoption of cycling as a viable mode for commuting, despite the evident benefits of (e-)bikes as sustainable, efficient, and health-promoting transportation modes. Bike network planning is a tedious process, relying on heuristic computational methods that frequently overlook the broader implications of introducing new cycling infrastructure, in particular the necessity to repurpose car lanes. In this work, we call for optimizing the trade-off between bike and car networks, effectively pushing for Pareto optimality. This shift in perspective gives rise to a novel linear programming formulation towards optimal bike network allocation. Our experiments, conducted using both real-world and synthetic data, testify the effectiveness and superiority of this optimization approach compared to heuristic methods. In particular, the framework provides stakeholders with a range of lane reallocation scenarios, illustrating potential bike network enhancements and their implications for car infrastructure. Crucially, our approach is adaptable to various bikeability and car accessibility evaluation criteria, making our tool a highly flexible and scalable resource for urban planning. This paper presents an advanced decision-support framework that can significantly aid urban planners in making informed decisions on cycling infrastructure development.

Optimization and Control,Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper focuses on the bicycle network planning problem in limited urban space. Despite the advantages of electric bicycles as a sustainable, efficient, and healthy means of transportation, the popularity of commuting by bicycle is still limited due to the lack of bicycle infrastructure in the current urban environment. Planning bicycle networks often relies on heuristic computational methods, which often overlook the wide-ranging impacts of introducing new bicycle infrastructure, especially the need for reallocating car lanes.

The paper proposes a new linear programming approach that optimizes the balance between bicycle and car networks, aiming for Pareto optimality, which considers the impact on car accessibility while improving the bicycle network. This approach evaluates the Pareto frontier by comparing the trade-off between bicycle accessibility and car travel time for different planning methods. In addition, they present an optimization framework that simultaneously improves the travel time for both bicycles and cars, accommodating various trade-offs and additional constraints. This framework can provide decision-makers with multiple lane reallocation plans, showcasing the potential for enhancing the bicycle network and its impact on car infrastructure.

Experiments show that this optimization method performs better than heuristic methods on both real-world and synthetic data. The framework offers a high degree of flexibility and scalability, which can be used to support urban planners in making informed decisions when developing bicycle infrastructure while minimizing the impact on other modes of transportation.