Deep-learning Optical Flow Outperforms PIV in Obtaining Velocity Fields from Active Nematics

Phu N. Tran,Sattvic Ray,Linnea Lemma,Yunrui Li,Reef Sweeney,Aparna Baskaran,Zvonimir Dogic,Pengyu Hong,Michael F. Hagan
2024-04-27
Abstract:Deep learning-based optical flow (DLOF) extracts features in adjacent video frames with deep convolutional neural networks. It uses those features to estimate the inter-frame motions of objects at the pixel level. In this article, we evaluate the ability of optical flow to quantify the spontaneous flows of MT-based active nematics under different labeling conditions. We compare DLOF against the commonly used technique, particle imaging velocimetry (PIV). We obtain flow velocity ground truths either by performing semi-automated particle tracking on samples with sparsely labeled filaments, or from passive tracer beads. We find that DLOF produces significantly more accurate velocity fields than PIV for densely labeled samples. We show that the breakdown of PIV arises because the algorithm cannot reliably distinguish contrast variations at high densities, particularly in directions parallel to the nematic director. DLOF overcomes this limitation. For sparsely labeled samples, DLOF and PIV produce results with similar accuracy, but DLOF gives higher-resolution fields. Our work establishes DLOF as a versatile tool for measuring fluid flows in a broad class of active, soft, and biophysical systems.
Soft Condensed Matter,Machine Learning
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper evaluates the performance of Deep Learning Optical Flow (DLOF) in measuring the velocity field in active nematics, which are liquid crystals composed of microtubules, compared to the traditional Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) method. DLOF utilizes deep convolutional neural networks to extract features from consecutive frames and estimate pixel-level motion between objects. The study found that for high-density labeled samples, DLOF provides more accurate velocity fields than PIV, addressing the issue of insufficient contrast discrimination along the nematic director direction, especially under high-density contrast changes. For sparsely labeled samples, both methods perform similarly, but DLOF has higher resolution. The paper demonstrates that DLOF is a powerful tool for measuring fluid flow in various active soft matter systems.