Joint Liability Model with Adaptation to Climate Change

Jiayue Zhang,Ken Seng Tan,Tony S. Wirjanto,Lysa Porth
2024-04-22
Abstract:This paper extends the application of ESG score assessment methodologies from large corporations to individual farmers' production, within the context of climate change. Our proposal involves the integration of crucial agricultural sustainability variables into conventional personal credit evaluation frameworks, culminating in the formulation of a holistic sustainable credit rating referred to as the Environmental, Social, Economics (ESE) score. This ESE score is integrated into theoretical joint liability models, to gain valuable insights into optimal group sizes and individual-ESE score relationships. Additionally, we adopt a mean-variance utility function for farmers to effectively capture the risk associated with anticipated profits. Through a set of simulation exercises, the paper investigates the implications of incorporating ESE scores into credit evaluation systems, offering a nuanced comprehension of the repercussions under various climatic conditions.
General Finance
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to address several key issues in agricultural credit assessment, particularly how to better evaluate the creditworthiness of individual farmers in the context of climate change and promote the development of sustainable agriculture. Specifically, the objectives of the paper can be summarized as follows: 1. **Expand ESG Scoring Method**: Extend the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scoring method, originally used for large enterprises, to the production activities of individual farmers. 2. **Propose a Comprehensive Credit Evaluation Framework**: Construct a comprehensive personal credit evaluation framework, namely the Environmental, Social, and Economic (ESE) scoring system, to assess the environmental and social sustainability performance of individual farmers beyond traditional economic factors. 3. **Optimize the Joint Liability Model**: Integrate the ESE scoring into the theoretical joint liability model to explore the optimal group size and the relationship between individual ESE scores, thereby providing valuable insights for credit decision-making. 4. **Adopt the Mean-Variance Utility Function**: To effectively capture the risks associated with expected profits, the paper adopts the mean-variance utility function to simulate farmers' behavioral choices. 5. **Explore the Impact of ESE Scoring**: Through a series of simulation exercises, study the impact of incorporating ESE scoring into the credit assessment system under different climate conditions. In summary, the paper is dedicated to developing a new credit assessment tool—the ESE scoring mechanism—to promote sustainability and efficiency in the agricultural credit sector while considering the challenges posed by climate change. By combining this new scoring mechanism with the existing joint liability model, the paper aims to provide a more accurate risk assessment method for the agricultural credit market to support the development of sustainable agricultural practices.