How is Platform Logic Embedded in Grassroots?
Zhu Chunyang,Mao Tianchan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19836/j.cnki.37-1100/c.2023.06.007
2023-01-01
Abstract:This paper examines the grassroots practice of community group purchasing and explores the possibilities that platforms offer for reshaping grassroots connections.Traditional communication studies have historically viewed media both as a means to increase the efficiency of grassroots community communication and as a tool to strengthen community identity.However,as we witness the rise of the platform society,this paper argues that it is essential to reassess how media influence the fundamental logic of grassroots governance. To address this issue,this study used in-depth interviews as its research methodology.In 2022,interviews were conducted with ten group leaders and participants who organized community group purchasing during a public health crisis.In addition,participatory observations were conducted in two group purchasing communities. Platform logic is a key concept in platform studies theory,with scholars such as van Dijck and others at the University of Amsterdam suggesting that platform logic not only represents the mode of operation of platform firms,but also embodies the principles of practice and value ideologies that permeate public life through the process of platformization.Specifically,platform logic refers to the algorithmic and data-driven ecosystem led by platform firms that changes the basic rules of public social relations and organization.In this context,this study finds that,unlike previous approaches to community group purchasing and grassroots governance,the innovation in the reorganization model stems from instances where community group purchasing re-emerges in the unique context of"platform dysfunction." On the one hand,the operation model of community group purchasing,characterized by data-driven integration of residents,open and free participation,and extensive connections to social capital,creates data nodes for grassroots individuals.On the other hand,by coordinating group purchasing activities,group leaders become the central nexus at the grassroots level,unleashing the vast potential of grassroots participation in governance and public services.Unlike previous grassroots organizing processes,this reorganization process is triggered by the purchase of goods and is initiated and voluntarily participated in by residents,covering almost all households in the community.It is built on a foundation of data nodes that are open to participation and layered with social capital.In such a context,community group purchasing serves the reorganizing function of meeting basic needs and maintaining social stability. More importantly,on the basis of group purchasing groups,the grassroots community forms temporary contracts for self-management services,a negotiation system with neighborhood committees and property management,and organizational forms for emotional support,mutual aid,and self-help,creating an online self-service system for grassroots residents.While the collaboration between the market and technology has undoubtedly provided effective incentives for community group purchasing in terms of scale and participation,it also raises concerns about the allocation of scarce resources and the embedding of personal interests within the"hidden decision-making layer". At a more fundamental level,beneath the interplay of platform logic,market and community,group leaders,through their deep engagement with data and social capital,are transforming the traditional binary governance relationship of"informing and being informed"into a multifaceted interface that enables residents to engage broadly in grassroots affairs.This transformation represents the potential for grassroots reorganization mechanisms to increase their vitality.