Abstract:As a result of the proliferation of 3D digitisation in the context of cultural heritage projects, digital assets and digitisation processes - being considered as proper research objects - must prioritise adherence to FAIR principles. Existing standards and ontologies, such as CIDOC CRM, play a crucial role in this regard, but they are often over-engineered for the need of a particular application context, thus making their understanding and adoption difficult. Application profiles of a given standard - defined as sets of ontological entities drawn from one or more semantic artefacts for a particular context or application - are usually proposed as tools for promoting interoperability and reuse while being tied entirely to the particular application context they refer to. In this paper, we present an adaptation and application of an ontology development methodology, i.e. SAMOD, to guide the creation of robust, semantically sound application profiles of large standard models. Using an existing pilot study we have developed in a project dedicated to leveraging virtual technologies to preserve and valorise cultural heritage, we introduce an application profile named CHAD-AP, that we have developed following our customised version of SAMOD. We reflect on the use of SAMOD and similar ontology development methodologies for this purpose, highlighting its strengths and current limitations, future developments, and possible adoption in other similar projects.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems Addressed by the Paper
The paper aims to address issues of standardization, interoperability, and reusability in the digitization process of cultural heritage. Specifically:
1. **Lack of Documentation**: Insufficient documentation of cultural heritage data and its digitization process.
2. **Data Disarray**: Poor management and organization of digitized data.
3. **Lack of Standards**: Absence of unified standards and interoperability, making it difficult to share and reuse data across different systems.
4. **Reproducibility Issues**: Methods and techniques in the digitization process are hard to reproduce.
5. **Complex Implementation**: Complexity in integrating digitized data and processes into functional and usable systems.
To address these issues, the paper proposes a method for developing an application profile based on existing standards (such as CIDOC-CRM). This method aims to create a data model that adheres to the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) and is suitable for specific application contexts.
### Specific Method
The paper employs the Simplified Agile Methodology for Ontology Development (SAMOD) to guide the creation of the application profile. The specific steps include:
1. **Requirement Gathering**: Collecting requirements through scenario descriptions, competency questions, and glossaries, and developing a self-contained ontology model (modelet).
2. **Pattern Merging**: Merging the newly developed modelet with the results of previous iterations and rechecking test cases.
3. **Model Refactoring**: Refactoring the overall model, including diagrams, data, and query examples, and rechecking test cases. In this step, it is recommended to reuse concepts and relationships from other relevant models to maximize interoperability.
### Application Example
The paper demonstrates the application of this method through a case study involving the digitization of a temporary exhibition on the Italian Renaissance naturalist and botanist Ulisse Aldrovandi. The exhibition includes over 200 different types of cultural heritage items (books, maps, specimens, scientific instruments, etc.) with detailed metadata catalogs. By applying the SAMOD method, the paper developed an application profile named CHAD-AP (Cultural Heritage Acquisition and Digitisation - Application Profile). This profile reused selected terms from standard models such as CIDOC-CRM, CRMdig, and AAT, thereby reducing redundancy and enhancing interoperability.
### Main Contributions
1. **Standardization**: Achieved standardized descriptions of cultural heritage data and digitization processes through the application profile.
2. **Interoperability**: Enhanced data interoperability and reusability across different systems.
3. **Reusability**: Reduced the introduction of new vocabulary by reusing terms from existing standard models, thereby increasing the model's reusability.
4. **FAIR Principles**: Ensured that digitized data and processes comply with the FAIR principles, improving data findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability.
In summary, by developing and applying CHAD-AP, the paper addresses the issues of standardization, interoperability, and reusability in the digitization process of cultural heritage, providing an effective solution for data management in the cultural heritage domain.