Abstract:Entanglement entropy, taken here to be geometric, requires a geometrically separable Hilbert space. In lattice gauge theories, it is not immediately clear if the physical Hilbert space is geometrically separable. In a previous paper we have shown that the physical Hilbert space in pure gauge abelian lattice theories exhibits some form of geometric scaling with the lattice volume, which suggest that the space is locally factorizable and, therefore, geometrically separable. In this paper, we provide strong evidence that indicates that this scaling is not present when the group is non-abelian. We do so by looking at the scaling of the dimension of the physical Hilbert space of theories with certain discrete groups. The lack of an appropriate scaling implies that the physical Hilbert space of such a theory does not admit a local factorization. We then extend the reasoning, as sensibly possible, to SU(2) and SU(N) to reach the same conclusion. Lastly, we show that the addition of matter fields to non-abelian lattice gauge theories makes the resulting physical Hilbert space locally factorizable.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is whether the physical Hilbert space has geometric separability in the lattice theory of non - Abelian gauge groups, and thus whether the geometric entanglement entropy can be defined. Specifically, the paper explores how the dimension of the physical Hilbert space changes with the lattice volume in pure gauge theories and non - Abelian gauge theories containing matter fields, and judges whether the physical Hilbert space can be locally decomposed based on these changes.
### Background and Motivation
In lattice gauge theory, a geometrically separable Hilbert space is required to define the entanglement entropy. However, in the case of non - Abelian gauge groups, it is not obvious whether the physical Hilbert space is geometrically separable. Previous research has shown that in pure Abelian gauge lattice theories, the dimension of the physical Hilbert space exhibits a certain form of geometric scaling as the lattice volume increases, indicating that this space can be locally decomposed and is thus geometrically separable. However, it is unclear whether this scaling property still exists when the gauge group is non - Abelian.
### Main Findings
1. **Non - Abelian Pure Gauge Theories**:
- By studying theories with certain discrete groups, the paper provides strong evidence that when the gauge group is non - Abelian, the dimension of the physical Hilbert space no longer exhibits appropriate scaling as the lattice volume increases.
- The lack of appropriate scaling means that the physical Hilbert space cannot be locally decomposed.
2. **Non - Abelian Gauge Theories Containing Matter Fields**:
- When matter fields are introduced, the physical Hilbert space of non - Abelian gauge theories becomes locally decomposable.
- The introduction of matter fields makes the non - commutativity of gauge group elements irrelevant, thus allowing local decomposition similar to that when Abelian gauge groups are coupled with matter fields.
### Methods and Conclusions
- **Methods**:
- By analyzing how the dimension of the physical Hilbert space of different discrete groups changes with the lattice volume, the researchers reached the above conclusions.
- This analysis method was extended to \( \text{SU}(2) \) and \( \text{SU}(N) \) gauge groups, and consistent conclusions were obtained.
- **Conclusions**:
- The physical Hilbert space of non - Abelian pure gauge theories does not have geometric separability, so it is difficult to define the geometric entanglement entropy.
- After introducing matter fields, the physical Hilbert space becomes locally decomposable, so the geometric entanglement entropy can be defined.
### Formula Examples
- **Dimension Scaling of Physical Hilbert Space**:
\[
\log \dim(\mathcal{H}_{\text{phys}}) = V \log \dim(\mathcal{H}_{\text{bulk}}^x) + B \log \dim(\mathcal{H}_{\text{boundary}}^y) + \log \dim(\mathcal{H}_{\text{central}})
\]
where \( V \) is the bulk volume, \( B \) is the boundary area, and \( \mathcal{H}_{\text{bulk}}^x \), \( \mathcal{H}_{\text{boundary}}^y \) and \( \mathcal{H}_{\text{central}} \) are the local Hilbert spaces of the bulk, boundary and central parts respectively.
- **Representation of Physical States**:
\[
|\psi\rangle_{\text{phys}} = \alpha | \uparrow \uparrow \rangle + \beta | \downarrow \downarrow \rangle
\]
This state represents a state in the physical subspace, where \( \alpha \) and \( \beta \) are complex coefficients satisfying the normalization condition \( |\alpha|^2+|\beta|^2 = 1 \).
Through these studies, the paper provides a new perspective for understanding the geometric entanglement entropy in non - Abelian gauge theories.