Quantity and quantitative properties in physics and metrology

Savely G. Karshenboim

2024-04-04

Abstract:I discuss various aspects of the concept of a quantity in physics and metrology and related consideration in reference documents of IUPAP, IUPAC, ISO, IEC, and JCGM.

Classical Physics,High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper discusses the concept of "quantity" in physics and metrology and its application and definition differences in different fields. The author points out that in physics, quantity is used to quantitatively describe natural phenomena, while metrology focuses on the presentation and standardization of measurement results. Quantities in physics may not be directly measurable, such as electric potential and vector potential, but they play important roles in physical laws, even if these quantities may have gauge invariance, that is, changes do not affect observable physical properties.

In metrology, quantity is usually associated with measurable results, expressed as a product of numerical value and unit. Metrology emphasizes the uncertainty of measurement results and unit uniformity for applications in industry, commerce, law, and other areas. However, certain physical quantities such as vectors and tensors may be ambiguous in the definition of metrology because they involve mathematical analysis operations rather than just algebraic operations.

The paper also discusses the dimensionality of quantities in special relativity and the representation of quantities in different reference frames. In addition, the author mentions the application of complex numbers in physics, such as impedance, which is considered as a quantity in practice, although its value may be complex, which is not entirely consistent with the definition of quantity in metrology.

The paper also points out methodological differences in dealing with quantities in multivariable and non-scaling spaces between physics and metrology. For example, vectors in a pressure-temperature (p-T) diagram represent two quantities with different units, but need to be considered as a whole.

Finally, the author discusses issues in education and regulations, arguing that physics education and scientific research need to be consistent with the definition of metrology to avoid confusion, especially when dealing with unmeasurable physical quantities or complex theoretical predictions. The paper calls for a reconsideration of the definition of core metrological terms to ensure better coordination of concepts between physics, education, and metrology.