Hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel: influence of post-processing, printing direction, temperature and pre-straining

G. Álvarez,Z. Harris,K. Wada,C. Rodríguez,E. Martínez-Pañeda

2023-11-14

Abstract:The influence of post-build processing on the hydrogen embrittlement behavior of additively manufactured (AM) 316L stainless steel fabricated using laser powder bed fusion was assessed at both room temperature and -50$^\circ$ C via uniaxial tensile experiments. In the absence of hydrogen at ambient temperature, all four evaluated AM conditions (as-built (AB), annealed (ANN), hot isostatic pressed (HIP), and HIP plus cold worked (CW) to 30\%) exhibit notably reduced ductility relative to conventionally manufactured (CM) 316L stainless steel. The AM material exhibits sensitivity to the build direction, both in the presence and absence of hydrogen, with a notable increase in yield strength in the X direction and enhanced ductility in the Z direction. Conversely, testing of non-charged specimens at -50$^\circ$ C revealed similar ductility between the CM, AB, ANN, and HIP conditions. Upon hydrogen charging, the ductility of all four AM conditions was found to be similar to that of CM 316L at ambient temperature, with the HIP condition actually exceeding the CM material. Critically, testing of hydrogen-charged samples at -50$^\circ$ C revealed that the ductility of the HIP AM 316L condition was nearly double that observed in the CM 316L. This improved performance persisted even after cold working, as the CW AM 316L exhibited comparable ductility to CM 316L at -50 C after hydrogen charging, despite having a 2-fold higher yield strength. Feritscope measurements suggest this increased performance is related to the reduced propensity for AM 316L to form strain-induced martensite during deformation, even after significant post-processing treatments. These results demonstrate that AM 316L can be post-processed using typical procedures to exhibit similar to or even improved resistance to hydrogen embrittlement relative to CM 316L.

Chemical Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper mainly discusses the performance of additive manufacturing (AM) 316L stainless steel in terms of hydrogen embrittlement, especially the effects of post-processing, printing direction, temperature, and pre-strain. The study evaluated the performance of AM 316L (without hydrogen treatment and with hydrogen treatment) and conventional manufacturing (CM) 316L through uniaxial tensile tests at room temperature and -50°C.

At room temperature, the ductility of AM materials without hydrogen treatment is significantly lower than CM 316L under all conditions (such as as-built, annealed, hot isostatic pressing, and cold working). However, after hydrogen treatment, the ductility of all AM conditions is similar to CM 316L, and the hot isostatic pressing treated AM material even exhibits better performance than CM material. At -50°C, the ductility of non-hydrogen-treated samples shows similarities between AM and CM 316L, but after hydrogen treatment, the ductility of AM 316L (especially hot isostatic pressing treated) is nearly double that of CM material.

The study found that AM 316L is sensitive to the build direction, and the yield strength along the X direction increases and the ductility along the Z direction enhances, with or without hydrogen. Furthermore, the sensitivity to hydrogen embrittlement may be attributed to the reduced tendency of strain-induced martensite formation during deformation of AM 316L.

In conclusion, the study indicates that with proper post-processing, AM 316L can exhibit hydrogen embrittlement resistance equivalent to or better than CM 316L, and emphasizes the importance of testing methods, temperature, and microstructure in evaluating hydrogen embrittlement of AM materials.