AI for bureaucratic productivity: Measuring the potential of AI to help automate 143 million UK government transactions

Vincent J. Straub,Youmna Hashem,Jonathan Bright,Satyam Bhagwanani,Deborah Morgan,John Francis,Saba Esnaashari,Helen Margetts

2024-03-19

Abstract:There is currently considerable excitement within government about the potential of artificial intelligence to improve public service productivity through the automation of complex but repetitive bureaucratic tasks, freeing up the time of skilled staff. Here, we explore the size of this opportunity, by mapping out the scale of citizen-facing bureaucratic decision-making procedures within UK central government, and measuring their potential for AI-driven automation. We estimate that UK central government conducts approximately one billion citizen-facing transactions per year in the provision of around 400 services, of which approximately 143 million are complex repetitive transactions. We estimate that 84% of these complex transactions are highly automatable, representing a huge potential opportunity: saving even an average of just one minute per complex transaction would save the equivalent of approximately 1,200 person-years of work every year. We also develop a model to estimate the volume of transactions a government service undertakes, providing a way for government to avoid conducting time consuming transaction volume measurements. Finally, we find that there is high turnover in the types of services government provide, meaning that automation efforts should focus on general procedures rather than services themselves which are likely to evolve over time. Overall, our work presents a novel perspective on the structure and functioning of modern government, and how it might evolve in the age of artificial intelligence.

Computers and Society,Artificial Intelligence

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How to automate the complex but repetitive bureaucratic tasks of the government through artificial intelligence (AI) technology, in order to improve the productivity of public services and reduce the time consumption of skilled workers**.

Specifically, the authors focus on which parts of the approximately 1 billion citizen - facing transactional transactions processed by the UK central government each year can be optimized through AI - driven automation. These transactional transactions involve approximately 400 services, of which approximately 143 million are complex repetitive transactions. The authors estimate that 84% of these complex transactions have a high potential for automation. If one minute of time can be saved on average for each complex transaction, then the workload equivalent to 1,200 person - years can be saved each year.

To answer this question, the authors carried out the following work:

1. **Describe and quantify the structure and trading volume of government services**:
- The authors analyzed 377 active services, covering 57 central government departments, ministries, and agencies.
- They measured the trading volume distribution of these services and described the inequality in trading dynamics.

2. **Evaluate the automation potential of service transactions**:
- The authors introduced a model named Automatability of Service Tasks (AST) index to measure the automation potential of decision - making services. This index is based on task content classification and ranges from [0, 1], where 1 indicates being completely composed of routine tasks and 0 indicates being completely composed of non - routine tasks.
- By manually reviewing and classifying the tasks of 201 decision - making services, the AST index of each service was calculated.

3. **Consider the potential impact of generative AI**:
- The authors also proposed a Potential for Generative AI (PGenAI) scoring standard to evaluate the potential of generative AI to support tasks that require subjective judgment or interpersonal interaction.
- The PGenAI score divides services into four levels: "no potential", "low potential", "medium potential", and "high potential".

Finally, this study provides a detailed perspective on the modern government structure and operation mode, and explores the possible evolution direction of the government in the AI era. Through these works, the authors hope to provide a method for the government to avoid time - consuming trading volume measurement and provide guidance for future automation efforts.

### Key formulas

- **AST index calculation formula**:
\[
AST=\frac{\text{Number of routine tasks}}{\text{Total number of tasks}}
\]
where the AST value is rescaled to the range of [0, 1].

- **PGenAI scoring standard**:
This scoring standard evaluates the impact of generative AI on services according to the types of tasks included in the services, and the specific classification is as follows:
- No potential
- Low potential
- Medium potential
- High potential

These methods and models help the authors quantify and evaluate the automation potential of government services, providing strong support for future policy - making and technology application.