Abstract:The public release of Large Language Models (LLMs) has sparked tremendous interest in how humans will use Artificial Intelligence (AI) to accomplish a variety of tasks. In our study conducted with Boston Consulting Group, a global management consulting firm, we examine the performance implications of AI on realistic, complex, and knowledge-intensive tasks. The pre-registered experiment involved 758 consultants comprising about 7% of the individual contributor-level consultants at the company. After establishing a performance baseline on a similar task, subjects were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: no AI access, GPT-4 AI access, or GPT-4 AI access with a prompt engineering overview. We suggest that the capabilities of AI create a “jagged technological frontier” where some tasks are easily done by AI, while others, though seemingly similar in difficulty level, are outside the current capability of AI. For each one of a set of 18 realistic consulting tasks within the frontier of AI capabilities, consultants using AI were significantly more productive (they completed 12.2% more tasks on average, and completed task 25.1% more quickly), and produced significantly higher quality results (more than 40% higher quality compared to a control group). Consultants across the skills distribution benefited significantly from having AI augmentation, with those below the average performance threshold increasing by 43% and those above increasing by 17% compared to their own scores. For a task selected to be outside the frontier, however, consultants using AI were 19 percentage points less likely to produce correct solutions compared to those without AI. Further, our analysis shows the emergence of two distinctive patterns of successful AI use by humans along a spectrum of human-AI integration. One set of consultants acted as “Centaurs,” like the mythical halfhorse/half-human creature, dividing and delegating their solution-creation activities to the AI or to themselves. Another set of consultants acted more like “Cyborgs,” completely integrating their task flow with the AI and continually interacting with the technology.

Measuring the Impact of AI on Information Worker Productivity

How much does AI impact development speed? An enterprise-based randomized controlled trial

Assessing the Impact of Artificial Intelligence Tools on Employee Productivity: Insights from a Comprehensive Survey Analysis

Analyzing the Impact of AI Tools on Student Study Habits and Academic Performance

Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier: Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of AI on Knowledge Worker Productivity and Quality

Take It, Leave It, or Fix It: Measuring Productivity and Trust in Human-AI Collaboration

Evaluation of Task Specific Productivity Improvements Using a Generative Artificial Intelligence Personal Assistant Tool

Predictably Satisfied: Contributions of Artificial Intelligence to Intra-Organizational Communication

Randomized Controlled Trials for Security Copilot for IT Administrators

Information Seeking Using AI Assistants

Proliferation of AI Tools: A Multifaceted Evaluation of User Perceptions and Emerging Trend

Measuring the Occupational Impact of AI: Tasks, Cognitive Abilities and AI Benchmarks

Friend or Foe? Teaming Between Artificial Intelligence and Workers with Variation in Experience

Assist me or replace me? Uncovering the influence of AI awareness on employees' counterproductive work behaviors

Impact of AI-tooling on the Engineering Workspace

The Rise of Artificial Intelligence and Its Influence on Employee Performance and Work

Artificial intelligence for employee engagement and productivity

Towards Decoding Developer Cognition in the Age of AI Assistants

Does Artificial Intelligence benefit UK businesses? An empirical study of the impact of AI on productivity

Partnering with AI: the case of digital productivity assistants