Abstract:We present a new method that simultaneously solves for cosmology and galaxy bias on non-linear scales. The method uses the halo model to analytically describe the (non-linear) matter distribution, and the conditional luminosity function (CLF) to specify the halo occupation statistics. For a given choice of cosmological parameters, this model can be used to predict the galaxy luminosity function, as well as the two-point correlation functions of galaxies, and the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal, both as a function of scale and luminosity. These observables have been reliably measured from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. In this paper, the first in a series, we present the detailed, analytical model, which we test against mock galaxy redshift surveys constructed from high-resolution numerical N-body simulations. We demonstrate that our model, which includes scale dependence of the halo bias and a proper treatment of halo exclusion, reproduces the three-dimensional galaxy-galaxy correlation and the galaxy-matter cross-correlation (which can be projected to predict the observables) with an accuracy better than 10 (in most cases 5) per cent. Ignoring either of these effects, as is often done, results in systematic errors that easily exceed 40 per cent on scales of similar to 1 h(-1) Mpc, where the data are typically most accurate. Finally, since the projected correlation functions of galaxies are never obtained by integrating the redshift-space correlation function along the line of sight out to infinity, simply because the data only cover a finite volume, they are still affected by residual redshift-space distortions (RRSDs). Ignoring these, as done in numerous studies in the past, results in systematic errors that easily exceed 20 per cent on large scales (r(p) greater than or similar to 10 h(-1) Mpc). We show that it is fairly straightforward to correct for these RRSDs, to an accuracy better than similar to 2 per cent, using a mildly modified version of the linear Kaiser formalism.

A systematic study of projection biases in the Weak Lensing analysis of cosmic shear and the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing

Full-sky Ray-tracing Simulation of Weak Lensing Using ELUCID Simulations: Exploring Galaxy Intrinsic Alignment and Cosmic Shear Correlations

Cosmology with shear ratios: a joint study of weak lensing and spectroscopic redshift datasets

Avoiding lensing bias in cosmic shear analysis

Impact of Property Covariance on Cluster Weak lensing Scaling Relations

On scale-dependent cosmic shear systematic effects

Weak Lensing Reconstruction Through Cosmic Magnification - Ii. Improved Power Spectrum Determination and Map-Making

A General Framework for Removing Point Spread Function Additive Systematics in Cosmological Weak Lensing Analysis

Probing the Cosmological Principle with weak lensing shear

Weak Lensing by Galaxy Troughs in Des Science Verification Data

Cosmic Shear Bias and Calibration in Cosmic Shear Studies

Methodological refinement of the submillimeter galaxy magnification bias. I. Cosmological analysis with a single redshift bin

Impact of Large-Scale Structure Systematics on Cosmological Parameter Estimation

Improved Weak Lensing Photometric Redshift Calibration via StratLearn and Hierarchical Modeling

Machine Learning LSST 3x2pt analyses -- forecasting the impact of systematics on cosmological constraints using neural networks

Cosmological Constraints from a Combination of Galaxy Clustering and Lensing – III. Application to SDSS Data

Cosmological Constraints from a Combination of Galaxy Clustering and Lensing – I. Theoretical Framework