Abstract:The main goal of this work is to test the results of a methodological improvement in the measurement of the magnification bias signal on a sample of submillimeter galaxies. In particular, we investigate the constraining power of cosmological parameters within the Lambda CDM model. We also discuss important points that can affect the results. We measured the angular cross-correlation function between a sample of foreground GAMA II galaxies in a single wide spectroscopic redshift bin of $0.2<z<0.8$ and a sample of background submillimeter galaxies from Herschel-ATLAS. We focused on the photometric redshift range of $1.2<z<4.0,$ with an improved methodological framework. Interpreting the weak lensing signal within the halo model formalism and performing a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm, we obtained the posterior distribution of both the halo occupation distribution and cosmological parameters within a flat Lambda CDM model. Our analysis was also performed with additional galaxy clustering information via a foreground angular auto-correlation function. We observed an overall remarkable improvement in terms of uncertainties in both the halo occupation distribution and cosmological parameters with respect to previous results. A priori knowledge about beta , the logarithmic slope of the background integral number counts, is found to be paramount to derive constraints on $ when using the cross-correlation data alone. Assuming a physically motivated prior distribution for beta , we obtain mean values of $ $ and $ $ and an unconstrained distribution for the Hubble constant. These results are likely to suffer from sampling variance, since one of the fields, G15, appears to have an anomalous behavior with a systematically higher cross-correlation. We find that removing it from the sample yields mean values of $ $ and $ $ and, for the first time, a (loose) restriction of the Hubble constant is obtained via this observable: $h=0.79^ $. The addition of the angular auto-correlation of the foreground sample in a joint analysis tightens the constraints, but also reveals a discrepancy between both observables that might be an aggravated consequence of sampling variance or due to the presence of unmodeled aspects on small and intermediate scales.

Methodological refinement of the submillimeter galaxy magnification bias. I. Cosmological analysis with a single redshift bin

Methodological refinement of the submillimeter galaxy magnification bias. I. Cosmological analysis with a single redshift bin

Methodological refinement of the submillimeter galaxy magnification bias. II. Cosmological analysis with tomography

Methodological refinement of the submillimeter galaxy magnification bias. Paper 0: cross-correlation function measurements

Cosmic Insights from Galaxy Clusters: Exploring Magnification Bias on Sub-millimeter Galaxies

Cosmic insights from galaxy clusters: Exploring magnification bias on sub-millimetre galaxies

Magnification Bias Estimators for Realistic Surveys: an Application to the BOSS Survey

Weak Lensing Reconstruction Through Cosmic Magnification - Ii. Improved Power Spectrum Determination and Map-Making

A 1% accurate method to include baryonic effects in galaxy-galaxy lensing models

Galaxy Bias from Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing in the DES Science Verification Data

Toward the measurement of neutrino masses: Performance of cosmic magnification with submillimeter galaxies

Mass density profiles at kiloparsec scales using the sub-millimetre galaxies magnification bias

Galaxy bias from the DES Science Verification data: combining galaxy density maps and weak lensing maps

Euclid Preparation. XL. Impact of magnification on spectroscopic galaxy clustering

Cosmological Constraints from a Combination of Galaxy Clustering and Lensing – III. Application to SDSS Data

Biases in galaxy spectral analysis from strong lensing differential magnification effect and correction methods

Detection of Enhancement in Number Densities of Background Galaxies due to Magnification by Massive Galaxy Clusters

Cosmological Constraints from a Combination of Galaxy Clustering and Lensing – I. Theoretical Framework

Galaxy Bias from the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification Data: Combining Galaxy Density Maps and Weak Lensing Maps