Technology-assisted Journal Writing for Improving Student Mental Wellbeing: Humanoid Robot vs. Voice Assistant

Batuhan Sayis,Hatice Gunes
2024-03-08
Abstract:Conversational agents have a potential in improving student mental wellbeing while assisting them in self-disclosure activities such as journalling. Their embodiment might have an effect on what students disclose, and how they disclose this, and students overall adherence to the disclosure activity. However, the effect of embodiment in the context of agent assisted journal writing has not been studied. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the viability of using social robots (SR) and voice assistants (VA) for eliciting rich disclosures in journal writing that contributes to mental health status improvement in students over time. Forty two undergraduate and graduate students participated in the study that assessed the mood changes (via Brief Mood Introspection Scale, BMIS), level of subjective self-disclosure (via Subjective Self-Disclosure Questionnaire, SSDQ), and perceptions toward the agents (via Robot Social Attributes Scale, RoSAS) with and without agent (SR or VA) assisted journal writing. Results suggest that only in robot condition there are mood improvements, higher levels of disclosure, and positive perceptions over time in technology-assisted journal writing. Our results suggest that robot assisted journal writing has some advantages over voice assistant one for eliciting rich disclosures that contributes to mental health status improvement in students over time.
Human-Computer Interaction
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper explores the differences in the effects of using Social Robots (SR) and Voice Assistants (VA) as aids in diary writing on improving students' mental health. The study focuses on the following three questions: 1. What are the differences in the improvement of students' mental health conditions when using SR and VA as aids in diary writing (RQ1)? 2. How does the extent of self-disclosure by students under the assistance of SR and VA change over time (RQ2)? 3. How do students' opinions on SR and VA change over time (RQ3)? Through a four-week experiment with 42 undergraduate and graduate students, the research found that only when using SR did students' emotions improve, the extent of self-disclosure increase, and they hold a positive attitude towards technology-assisted diary writing. In contrast, diary writing assisted by VA did not demonstrate these effects. The results indicate that compared to VA, diary writing assisted by SR may be more helpful in enhancing students' self-disclosure, thereby improving their mental health conditions in the long term. The study also emphasizes the role of embodiment in promoting students' emotional expression and engagement, and suggests that SR may provide a greater sense of comfort and security compared to VA. However, the study also has some limitations, such as not separately evaluating the effects of diary writing without assistance tools, not including independent sample t-tests, and potential biases due to reliance on self-report data. Future research is needed to further explore these limitations, validate, and expand on these findings.