Abstract:Empirical business cycle studies using cross-country data usually cannot achieve causal relationships while within-country studies mostly focus on the bust period. We provide the first causal investigation into the boom period of the 1999-2010 U.S. cross-metropolitan business cycle. Using a novel research design, we show that credit expansion in private-label mortgages causes a differentially stronger boom (2000-2006) and bust (2007-2010) cycle in the house-related industries in the high net-export-growth areas. Most importantly, our unique research design enables us to perform the most comprehensive tests on theories (hypotheses) regarding the business cycle. We show that the following theories (hypotheses) cannot explain the cause of the 1999-2010 U.S. business cycle: the speculative euphoria hypothesis, the real business cycle theory, the collateral-driven credit cycle theory, the business uncertainty theory, and the extrapolative expectation theory.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to address the causes of the U.S. business cycles from 1999 to 2010, with a particular focus on the causal relationships during the periods of prosperity (2000-2006) and recession (2007-2010). The study adopts an innovative design and reveals that the credit expansion of private-label mortgages leads to more intense cyclical fluctuations in the housing-related industry in regions with high net exports. Through detailed empirical analysis, the author demonstrates that several popular business cycle theories, such as the speculative frenzy hypothesis, the real business cycle theory, the mortgage-driven credit cycle theory, the theory of business uncertainty, and the extrapolative expectations theory, fail to explain the causes of the U.S. business cycles during this period.
The paper first introduces the research background, highlighting the importance of understanding the causes of business cycles in order to avoid similar deep recessions. It then proposes an approach that combines regional economics and international economics to construct a causal framework for identifying long-term credit incentives and integrating them with geographical differences. The study finds that credit expansion resulting from net export growth, especially in private-label mortgages, is a key factor in triggering the U.S. business cycles from 1999 to 2010, particularly in regions with high net export growth, where the housing-related industry experiences more significant cycles of prosperity and recession.
In addition, the paper also tests alternative theories such as the speculative frenzy hypothesis and the real business cycle theory, and through a series of empirical results, it shows that these theories fail to explain the origins of this business cycle. The study also emphasizes that its unique design enables comprehensive testing of various theories.
In summary, the fundamental causes of the U.S. business cycles from 1999 to 2010 are addressed in this paper. Through rigorous empirical research, the paper concludes that credit expansion, particularly the credit expansion of private-label mortgages, is the main driving force behind the economic cyclical fluctuations during this period, while popular theories have failed to fully explain this phenomenon.