Matters Arising: On physical nature of the optical deDroglie-Mackinnon wave packets. ARISING FROM Layton A. Hall and Ayman F. Abouraddy Nature Physics https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01876-6 (2023)

Peeter Saari,Ioannis M. Besieris

2024-02-22

Abstract:Hall and Abouraddy [1] have reported first experimental observation of optical de Broglie-Mackinnon wave packets, which is a seminal achievement in the study of so-called non-diffracting optical pulses. These wave packets propagate in free space without spreading with subluminal relativistic velocities, i.e., with speeds slower but close to the velocity of light in vacuum. The experiments in [1] became possible thanks to the application of quite a witty method. Unfortunately, the explanation of the physical nature of the wave packets and their graphical and mathematical descriptions in the theoretical part of [1] suffer from some ambiguities that need to be clarified.

Optics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to clarify and correct some ambiguities and errors in the theoretical descriptions of optical de Broglie - Mackinnon wave packets (hereinafter referred to as "dBM waves" for short). Specifically, the paper points out the following main issues:

1. **Generation mechanism of the wave packet**: The paper criticizes the view in the original literature that the dBM wave is generated by a dipole source located at the origin. According to the nature of the dBM wave, it is a passive wave field, that is, its source is far outside the observation point. Therefore, if the wave is generated by a dipole source, its field distribution will not show a passive standing - wave characteristic as shown in the last column of Figure 2.

2. **Misleading nature of the waveform diagram**: The paper points out that the graph in the last column of Figure 2b is misleading because it does not correctly depict the dBM wave but shows the phenomenon that the wavelengths before and after the pulse are different due to the Doppler effect. However, in the dBM wave, this difference does not exist because the incident wave and the outgoing wave have opposite directions at any point, so the Doppler effect will not manifest in this way. This graph may actually show the outgoing field affected by the Doppler effect emitted by a moving source.

3. **Inconsistency between the figure caption and the actual situation**: The paper points out the inconsistency between the figure caption of Figure 2 and its last column. The figure caption claims to show "the real part of the space - time field profile ψ(x, z; t) on the fixed axial plane z", while the markings in the figure indicate that this column shows the squared modulus of ψ(x, z; t) at a fixed instant of time.

4. **Main error in equation (2)**: The paper points out that the function used in equation (2) to represent the sub - light - speed and rigidly propagating envelope of the dBM wave packet is wrongly chosen. For the (3 + 1) - dimensional case, it is correct to use the sinc function (or the zero - order spherical Bessel function), but for the (2 + 1) - dimensional dBM wave packet discussed in the paper, the first - kind zero - order cylindrical Bessel function J0(·) should be used, and the parameter expressions are the same (not divided by π). This is a result directly obtained by performing a superposition integral on the plane - wave spectrum. It is known that the Fourier transform of such a spectrum is the Bessel function J0(·). Although the sinc function and J0(·) have qualitatively similar oscillatory behaviors, as the distance r increases from the maximum value, the sinc function decays at a rate of r^-1, while J0(·) decays at a rate of r^-1/2, that is, it decays more slowly.

Finally, the paper also emphasizes that the dBM wave packet can move at any sub - light - speed velocity and does not have to be limited to relativistic velocities. In addition, any stationary focused monochromatic light field, as long as it is observed by an appropriately moving detection device, can be seen as a pulse similar to the dBM wave when the detector passes through the focus.

Overall, this review article aims to help readers better understand the physical properties of optical dBM wave packets by pointing out these specific theoretical and technical details, while affirming the contributions of the original research in the experimental aspect.