Demonstrating Invalidity of Solution Methods Involved in Solving Compatibility Equations

Peng Shi

2024-03-01

Abstract:In the theory of elasticity, the constraint of compatibility conditions on displacement field is not equivalent to the property of displacement field. The difference may broaden the possibility of solutions to elasticity problems, which means that the solution methods involved in solving the compatibility equations like stress-based solution method and stress function method may be invalid. The study argues the validity of the solution methods involved in solving the compatibility equations. It is concluded that the absence of constraints on local rigid body rotation causes the non-uniqueness of displacement fields for a rectangular beam purely bent and a cantilever loaded at the end.

Classical Physics,Applied Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve

This paper aims to explore and verify the effectiveness of the methods used to solve compatibility equations in elasticity. Specifically, the paper analyzes the known solutions to two classic problems: pure bending of a rectangular beam and end loading of a cantilever beam, and points out potential issues with these solutions.

### Main Findings

1. **Non-uniqueness Issue**:
- For the problems of pure bending of a rectangular beam and end loading of a cantilever beam, the paper finds that their displacement fields are non-unique.
- Certain parts of the displacement field are caused by local rigid body rotations, which are not constrained in the existing compatibility conditions, leading to non-uniqueness of the solutions.

2. **Impact of Local Rigid Body Rotations**:
- The existing compatibility conditions do not account for the constraints of local rigid body rotations on the displacement field.
- The lack of such constraints is the main reason for the non-uniqueness of the displacement field.

3. **Re-examination of Compatibility Conditions**:
- The paper re-derives the compatibility conditions for the displacement field and finds that the existing compatibility conditions alter the inherent properties of the vector field.
- The correct compatibility condition should be \(\nabla \times \nabla u = 0\), which applies to any vector field with second-order derivatives.

### Conclusion

The paper concludes that the existing methods for solving compatibility equations have flaws when dealing with problems of elastic deformation, primarily due to the lack of constraints on local rigid body rotations. This leads to the non-uniqueness of the displacement field, especially in classic problems such as pure bending of a rectangular beam and end loading of a cantilever beam. Therefore, the paper suggests that future research should consider the constraints of local rigid body rotations to ensure the uniqueness and correctness of the solutions.