H$_2$ and CO$_2$ Network Strategies for the European Energy System

Fabian Hofmann,Christoph Tries,Fabian Neumann,Elisabeth Zeyen,Tom Brown

2024-09-16

Abstract:Hydrogen and carbon dioxide transport can both play an essential role in climate-neutral energy systems. Hydrogen networks help serve regions with high energy demand, while excess emissions are transported away in carbon dioxide networks. For the synthesis of carbonaceous fuels, it is less clear which input should be transported: hydrogen to carbon point sources or carbon to low-cost hydrogen. We explore both networks' potential synergies and competition in a cost-optimal carbon-neutral European energy system. In a direct comparison, a hydrogen network is more cost-effective than a carbon network, as it serves to transport hydrogen to demand and to point source of carbon for utilization. However, in a hybrid scenario where both networks are present, the carbon network effectively complements the hydrogen network, promoting carbon capture from distributed biomass and reducing reliance on direct air capture. The layouts of the hydrogen and carbon dioxide networks are robust if the climate target is tightened to be net-negative.

Physics and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to effectively integrate the hydrogen (H₂) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) transport networks in the European energy system to achieve the goal of climate neutrality. Specifically, the paper explores the potential synergy and competition between the hydrogen network and the carbon dioxide network in a cost - optimal carbon - neutral European energy system. By comparing and analyzing network configurations in different scenarios (including the baseline scenario, carbon dioxide - only network, hydrogen - only network, and hybrid network), the paper evaluates the impact of these networks on different decarbonization strategies and the inefficiency of infrastructure layout caused by investment in the absence or with only a single transport technology.

### Core issues of the paper
1. **Synergy and competition between hydrogen and carbon dioxide networks**:
- The hydrogen network can transport hydrogen to demand areas and deliver hydrogen to carbon point sources for carbon utilization.
- The carbon dioxide network can transport the captured carbon dioxide from distributed point sources to low - cost hydrogen production sites or sequestration locations.
- In a hybrid network, the carbon dioxide network can effectively supplement the hydrogen network, promote carbon capture from distributed biomass, and reduce the dependence on direct air capture.

2. **Cost optimization**:
- By comparing the total system costs under different network configurations, evaluate which network configuration is the most cost - effective.
- The study found that the hydrogen network is more cost - effective than the carbon dioxide network, but in a hybrid network, the carbon dioxide network can effectively supplement the hydrogen network and further reduce the system cost.

3. **Impact of decarbonization strategies**:
- Analyze the impact of different network configurations on the deployment of carbon capture, carbon utilization, and carbon sequestration technologies.
- Explore how to optimize the geographical distribution of carbon capture and hydrogen production in different scenarios to achieve the lowest system cost.

4. **Policy recommendations**:
- Emphasize the importance of coordinated planning across sectors and across national boundaries, because good renewable resources and sequestration potential are regional.
- Propose that multi - network deployment can provide a certain degree of robustness, so that even if a certain network has problems, the system can still respond.

### Main conclusions
- The **hybrid network configuration** is optimal and can achieve the highest system cost reduction (5.3%).
- The **hydrogen network** performs well in transporting low - cost hydrogen to high - demand areas, while the **carbon dioxide network** is more effective in transporting low - cost carbon from point sources to sequestration sites.
- The **network layout** remains robust under more stringent emission targets, showing the flexibility and adaptability of the system.

### Methodology
The paper uses the open - source capacity expansion model PyPSA - Eur for research. This model covers multiple energy sectors such as electricity, heat, industry, agriculture, and transportation. The model optimizes design and operation, taking into account cost assumptions for various energy carriers and technologies. The time range of the study is one year, with a time resolution of 3 hours and a spatial resolution of 90 regions. Exogenous assumptions include energy demand and non - abatable emission data.

Through these methods, the paper comprehensively evaluates the impact of different network configurations on the European energy system and provides an important reference for achieving the climate - neutral goal.