Social Learning with Intrinsic Preferences

Fabian Dvorak,Urs Fischbacher

2024-02-29

Abstract:Despite strong evidence for peer effects, little is known about how individuals balance intrinsic preferences and social learning in different choice environments. Using a combination of experiments and discrete choice modeling, we show that intrinsic preferences and social learning jointly influence participants' decisions, but their relative importance varies across choice tasks and environments. Intrinsic preferences guide participants' decisions in a subjective choice task, while social learning determines participants' decisions in a task with an objectively correct solution. A choice environment in which people expect to be rewarded for their choices reinforces the influence of intrinsic preferences, whereas an environment in which people expect to be punished for their choices reinforces conformist social learning. We use simulations to discuss the implications of these findings for the polarization of behavior.

General Economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper explores how individuals balance between intrinsic preference and social learning, especially in the decision-making process under different choice environments. Through the combination of experiments and discrete choice modeling, the study finds that both intrinsic preference and social learning influence participants' decisions, but their relative importance varies depending on the choice task and environment. In subjective choice tasks, such as art selection, intrinsic preference guides the decision-making process; while in tasks with objectively correct answers, such as knowledge quiz, social learning determines the decision. The environment of rewards and punishments can enhance or weaken the influence of these two factors, with reward environments strengthening intrinsic preference and punishment environments reinforcing social conformity in social learning. Furthermore, the study identifies significant differences in individuals' social learning strategies and proposes an extended social learning model that considers diverse individual strategies and prior beliefs' impact on decision-making. This research is of great significance for understanding the phenomenon of behavioral polarization and provides a new perspective for experimental design and modeling in methodology.