Abstract:Background: Smart-home technologies, comprising environmental sensors, wearables and video are attracting interest in home healthcare delivery. Development of such technology is usually justified on the basis of the technology's potential to increase the autonomy of people living with long-term conditions. Studies of the ethics of smart-homes raise concerns about privacy, consent, social isolation and equity of access. Few studies have investigated the ethical perspectives of smart-home engineers themselves. By exploring the views of engineering researchers in a large smart-home project, we sought to contribute to dialogue between ethics and the engineering community. Methods: Either face-to-face or using Skype, we conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 20 early- and mid-career smart-home researchers from a multi-centre smart-home project, who were asked to describe their own experience and to reflect more broadly about ethical considerations that relate to smart-home design. With participants' consent, interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using a thematic approach. Results: Two overarching themes emerged: in 'Privacy', researchers indicated that they paid close attention to negative consequences of potential unauthorised information sharing in their current work. However, when discussing broader issues in smart-home design beyond the confines of their immediate project, researchers considered physical privacy to a lesser extent, even though physical privacy may manifest in emotive concerns about being watched or monitored. In 'Choice', researchers indicated they often saw provision of choice to end-users as a solution to ethical dilemmas. While researchers indicated that choices of end-users may need to be restricted for technological reasons, ethical standpoints that restrict choice were usually assumed and embedded in design. Conclusions: The tractability of informational privacy may explain the greater attention that is paid to it. However, concerns about physical privacy may reduce acceptability of smart-home technologies to future end-users. While attention to choice suggests links with privacy, this may misidentify the sources of privacy and risk unjustly burdening end-users with problems that they cannot resolve. Separating considerations of choice and privacy may result in more satisfactory treatment of both. Finally, through our engagement with researchers as participants this study demonstrates the relevance of (bio)ethics as a critical partner to smart-home engineering.

Charting Ethical Tensions in Multispecies Technology Research through Beneficiary-Epistemology Space

Designing Multispecies Worlds for Robots, Cats, and Humans

Ethics, Space, and Somatic Sensibilities: Comparing Relationships between Scientific Researchers and Their Human and Animal Experimental Subjects

Smart homes, private homes? An empirical study of technology researchers' perceptions of ethical issues in developing smart-home health technologies

Interdisciplinary Animal Research Ethics-Challenges, Opportunities, and Perspectives

Art-Science Collaboration in an EPSRC/BBSRC-Funded Synthetic Biology UK Research Centre

Relevance, Impartiality, Welfare and Consent: Principles of an Animal-Centered Research Ethics

Time to compile: A performance installation as human-robot interaction study examining self-evaluation and perceived control

Ethical Design of a Robot Platform for Disabled Employees: Some Practical Methodological Considerations

Bound by the Bounty: Collaboratively Shaping Evaluation Processes for Queer AI Harms

An Ethics Toolkit to Support Animal-Centered Research and Design

Improving Inclusivity in Robotics Design: An Exploration of Methods for Upstream Co-Creation

Ethical considerations in public engagement: developing tools for assessing the boundaries of research and involvement

With or Without Permission: Site-Specific Augmented Reality for Social Justice

Mapping for accessibility: A case study of ethics in data science for social good

Power Sharing, Capacity Building, and Evolving Roles in ELSI: The Center for the Ethics of Indigenous Genomic Research

An Empirical Design Justice Approach to Identifying Ethical Considerations in the Intersection of Large Language Models and Social Robotics

Co-creating a Transdisciplinary Map of Technology-mediated Harms, Risks and Vulnerabilities: Challenges, Ambivalences and Opportunities

Ethical Approval and Being a Virtuous Social Work Researcher. The Experience of Multi-site Research in UK Health and Social Care: An Approved Mental Health Professional Case Study

Ethical Futures in Art Education Research: Unlocking Interlocking Injustices in Academia

Multispecies, More-Than-Human, Nonhuman, Other-Than-Human