Michael Th. Rassias
Abstract:One of the themes of this paper is recent results on large gaps between primes. The first of these results has been achieved in the paper [12] by Ford, Green, Konyagin and Tao. It was later improved in the joint paper [13] of these four authors with Maynard. One of the main ingredients of these results are old methods due to Erdős and Rankin. Other ingredients are important breakthrough results due to Goldston, Pintz and Yildirim [15, 16, 17], and their extension by Maynard on small gaps between primes. All these previous results are discussed shortly. The results on the appearance of $k$-th powers of primes contained in those large gaps, obtained by the author in joint work with Maier [23, 24, 25] are based on a combination of the results just described with the matrix method of Maier.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is the research on large gaps between primes. Specifically, the paper explores how to use old methods and new breakthrough results to improve the lower - bound estimates of large gaps between primes. The following is a summary of the main content of the paper:
### Background of the Paper
The gaps between primes are a classic number - theory problem. The prime number theorem shows that the average gap between primes is approximately \(\log p_n\). However, for certain values of \(n\), the gaps between primes can be much larger than this average. Studying the properties and lower bounds of these large gaps is one of the hot topics in this field.
### Main Contributions
1. **Historical Review**:
- In 1931, Westzynthius proved a lower bound for large gaps between primes:
\[
G(X)\gg\frac{\log X\log_2 X}{\log_3 X}
\]
- In 1935, Erdős improved it to:
\[
G(X)\gg\frac{\log X\log_2 X}{(\log_3 X)^2}
\]
- In 1938, Rankin further improved the lower bound:
\[
G(X)\geq (c + o(1))\frac{\log X\log_2 X\log_4 X}{(\log_3 X)^2}
\]
2. **Recent Progress**:
- In 2014, Ford, Green, Konyagin and Tao made a major breakthrough in paper [12], proving that the constant \(c\) can be made arbitrarily large.
- Meanwhile, Maynard also independently achieved a similar result in paper [28], but using a different method.
3. **Methods and Techniques**:
- **Erdős - Rankin Method**: This is a classic method for estimating the lower bounds of large gaps between primes by constructing covering systems.
- **Multidimensional Sieve Method**: Maynard introduced the multidimensional sieve method, which further improved the research results on small gaps between primes.
- **GPY Sieve Method**: The sieve method proposed by Goldston, Pintz and Yildirim, which is used to study small gaps between primes.
4. **Specific Results**:
- Paper [13], completed by five authors in cooperation, proved that:
\[
G(X)\gg\frac{\log X\log_2 X\log_4 X}{\log_3 X}
\]
- Paper [23] further studied the large gaps containing \(K\) - th power primes and proved that there are infinitely many \(n\) such that:
\[
p_{n + 1}-p_n\geq c\frac{\log p_n\log_2 p_n\log_4 p_n}{\log_3 p_n}
\]
and the interval \([p_n, p_{n + 1}]\) contains a \(K\) - th power of a prime.
### Conclusion
By combining classic methods and new breakthrough results, this paper significantly improves the lower - bound estimates of large gaps between primes and extends to the study of large gaps containing specific types of primes. These results not only deepen the understanding of the distribution of primes but also provide new tools and methods for further research in related fields.