Abstract:The evolution of cooperation on interdependent networks is arousing increasing concern based on the fact that more and more complex systems in the real-world have been proven to be organized in the form of multi-layer networks rather than single-layer networks. In this study, we examine the effects of self-organized interdependence on the evolution and stabilization of cooperation with social dilemmas depicted by the Prisoner's Dilemma Game (PDG) and the Public Goods Game (PGG) in which agents with the most common strategy have the chance to be rewarded proportionally to the fitness of corresponding agents belonging to the other network. We show that such a type-free rewarding rule, independent of game strategy, establishes a time-varying interdependence between two initially independent populations whereby cooperation is highly promoted as well as stabilized both in the two-player PDG and in the multi-player PGG. Majority-pressure based interdependence at stake has proven pretty neutral in regard to game strategy because it is contingent on strategy configuration rather than strategy itself, which thus gives birth to homologous communities, including cooperative as well as non-cooperative, and thereby an enhanced spatial reciprocity between non-identical networks is triggered. Of particular interest is the double-edged sword effect of network interdependence on cooperation although in most instances the heavier the interdependence, the better the evolution of cooperation. Furthermore, interpretations of the nontrivial relationship between cooperation and benchmark threshold measuring the strategy's local popularity highlight that rewarding the minimum majority is optimal for the evolution of cooperation in such scenario. Finally, we claim our observations are also quite robust with respect to mutation.

Evolution of commitment in the spatial Public Goods Game through institutional incentives

Evolution of commitment in the spatial public goods game through institutional incentives

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Institutional Incentives for the Evolution of Committed Cooperation: Ensuring Participation is as Important as Enhancing Compliance

The dynamics of human behavior in the public goods game with institutional incentives

Threshold-initiated spatial public goods games

Emergence of Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game with Conditional Participation

Group Penalty on the Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games

The Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Groups

Effectiveness of conditional punishment for the evolution of public cooperation

Competition and cooperation among different punishing strategies in the spatial public goods game

Adaptive Evolution of Cooperation Through Darwinian Dynamics in Public Goods Games

The evolution of cooperation through institutional incentives and optional participation

Effects of punishment driven by inequity aversion on promoting cooperation in public goods games

Impact of Generalized Benefit Functions on the Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games with Continuous Strategies.

The Coevolution of Partner Switching and Strategy Updating in Non-Excludable Public Goods Game

Effects of the limited incentive pool on cooperation evolution in public goods game

Evolution of cooperation driven by majority-pressure based interdependence

Cooperation induced by wise incentive allocation in spontaneous institution

The regulation of good and evi promotes cooperation in public goods game

Evolution of cooperation in multilevel public goods games with community structures