Abstract:We study the decoherence of a system of $N$ non-interacting heavy particles (atoms) due to coherent scattering with a background gas. We introduce a framework for computing the induced phase shift and loss of contrast for arbitrary preparations of $N$-particle quantum states. We find phase shifts that are inherently $(N\geq 2)$-body effects and may be searched for in future experiments. We analyze simple setups, including a two-mode approximation of an interferometer. We study fully entangled $N00N$ states, which resemble the correlated positions in a matter interferometer, as well as totally uncorrelated product states that are representative of a typical state in an atom interferometer. We find that the extent to which coherent enhancements increase the rate of decoherence depends on the observable of interest, state preparation, and details of the experimental design. In the context of future ultralow-recoil (e.g., light dark matter) searches with atom interferometers we conclude that: {\it i}) there exists a coherently enhanced scattering phase which can be searched for using standard (i.e., contrast/visibility and phase) interferometer observables; {\it ii}) although decoherence rates of one-body observables are {\it not} coherently enhanced, a coherently enhanced loss of contrast can still arise from dephasing; and {\it iii}) higher statistical moments (which are immediately accessible in a counting experiment) {\it are} coherently enhanced and may offer a new tool with which to probe the soft scattering of otherwise undetectable particles in the laboratory.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about how to accurately calculate the collision - induced decoherence effect due to background gas scattering in an atomic interferometer. Specifically, the author focuses on how the coherent scattering between a non - interacting multi - particle system (such as an atomic cloud) and the background gas affects the phase shift and visibility loss of the system. The main contributions of the paper are as follows:
1. **Proposing a new framework**: The author introduced a framework for calculating the phase shift and contrast loss of an arbitrarily prepared multi - particle quantum state due to the coherent scattering of the background gas. This framework can handle many - body effects, especially for systems with \(N\geq2\).
2. **Analyzing different experimental setups**: The paper analyzed simple experimental setups, including two - mode approximation interferometers, and studied the fully entangled \(N00N\) state and the completely uncorrelated product state, which represent the relevant positions in matter interferometers and the states in typical atomic interferometers respectively.
3. **Exploring the impact of coherent enhancement**: The author found that the impact of coherent enhancement on the decoherence rate depends on the observable of interest, the preparation of the initial state, and the details of the experimental design. For example, in the search for ultra - low recoil (such as light dark matter), standard interferometer observables (such as contrast/visibility and phase) can be used to detect the coherently enhanced scattering phase.
4. **Proposing new tools**: The paper pointed out that higher - order statistical moments (which can be directly obtained in counting experiments) may be affected by coherent enhancement, which provides a new tool for detecting other difficult - to - detect particles in the laboratory.
### Main Conclusions
- **Coherently enhanced scattering phase**: There is a coherently enhanced scattering phase that can be detected by standard interferometer observables (such as contrast/visibility and phase).
- **Decoherence rate of single - body observables**: Although the decoherence rate of single - body observables is not coherently enhanced, phase mismatch can still lead to contrast loss.
- **Higher - order statistical moments**: Higher - order statistical moments (such as variance) are affected by coherent enhancement and may provide a new method for detecting other difficult - to - detect particles in the laboratory.
### Formula Display
- **Phase shift and decoherence kernel**:
\[
K_U = in(n + N - 2N_L)[1-\cos(q'\cdot\Delta x)]
\]
\[
K_D = n^2[1-\cos(q\cdot\Delta x)]-iNn\sin(q\cdot\Delta x)
\]
where \(-N\leq n\leq N\), \(0\leq N_L\leq N\), and \(\Delta x\) is the distance between the interferometer arms.
- **Evolution of density matrix elements**:
\[
\Delta\rho_A(\{x\}, \{x'\})=\rho_A(\{x\}, \{x'\})\int\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}\rho_\pi(p)\left(i\langle p|(T_{\{x\}}+T^\dagger_{\{x\}}-T_{\{x'\}}-T^\dagger_{\{x'\}})|p\rangle-\frac{1}{2}\langle p|(T_{\{x\}}T^\dagger_{\{x\}}+T_{\{x'\}}T^\dagger_{\{x'\}})|p\rangle+\langle p|T^\dagger_{\{x'\}}T_{\{x\}}|p\rangle\right)
\]
- **Contrast and phase in the interferometer**:
\[
\langle O_+\rangle=\text{Tr}(\rho_AO_+)=\frac{N}{2}(1 + V\cos\phi)
\]
\[
V\cos\phi = 2\text{Re}(\langle L|\rh