Decoherence by warm horizons

Jordan Wilson-Gerow,Annika Dugad,Yanbei Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.045002

2024-10-03

Abstract:Recently Danielson, Satishchandran, and Wald (DSW) have shown that quantum superpositions held outside of Killing horizons will decohere at a steady rate. This occurs because of the inevitable radiation of soft photons (gravitons), which imprint a electromagnetic (gravitational) ``which-path'' memory onto the horizon. Rather than appealing to this global description, an experimenter ought to also have a local description for the cause of decoherence. One might intuitively guess that this is just the bombardment of Hawking/Unruh radiation on the system, however simple calculations challenge this idea -- the same superposition held in a finite temperature inertial laboratory does not decohere at the DSW rate. In this work we provide a local description of the decoherence by mapping the DSW set-up onto a worldline-localized model resembling an Unruh-DeWitt particle detector. We present an interpretation in terms of random local forces which do not sufficiently self-average over long times. Using the Rindler horizon as a concrete example we clarify the crucial role of temperature, and show that the Unruh effect is the only quantum mechanical effect underlying these random forces. A general lesson is that for an environment which induces Ohmic friction on the central system (as one gets from the classical Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac force, in an accelerating frame) the fluctuation-dissipation theorem implies that when this environment is at finite temperature it will cause steady decoherence on the central system. Our results agree with DSW and provide the complementary local perspective.

High Energy Physics - Theory,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,Quantum Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the decoherence phenomenon of quantum superposition states when approaching the Killing horizon. Specifically, recent research by Danielson, Satishchandran, and Wald (DSW) has shown that quantum superposition states located outside the Killing horizon will decohere at a constant rate. This decoherence phenomenon is due to the radiation of soft photons (or gravitons) passing through the horizon, carrying "path information", which leads to the decoherence of the system. However, from the local perspective of the experimenter, the cause of this decoherence is not yet clear. An intuitive guess is that it may be due to the bombardment of the system by Hawking/Unruh radiation, but simple calculations challenge this idea - in an inertial laboratory at a finite temperature, the same superposition state does not decohere at the DSW rate.

Therefore, this paper aims to provide a local description to explain the decoherence phenomenon from the perspective of an accelerating observer. The authors achieve this by mapping the DSW setup to a local model of worldlines similar to the Unruh - DeWitt particle detector. They propose an explanation that the action of random local forces will not fully self - average over a long period of time, and these random forces are mainly caused by the Unruh effect. The article also emphasizes the crucial role of environmental temperature in inducing continuous decoherence of the central system, and verifies through specific calculations that their theory is consistent with the DSW results.

### Formula Summary

1. **DSW Decoherence Rate**:
\[
\Gamma_{\text{EM}}^{\text{DSW}}=\frac{q^{2}a^{3}\epsilon^{2}}{12\pi^{2}}
\]
where \(q\) is the charge, \(a\) is the acceleration, and \(\epsilon\) is the distance between superposition states.

2. **Phase Difference**:
\[
\Delta\Phi = q\int d\tau\hat{E}(\tau)\cdot\epsilon(\tau)
\]

3. **Contrast Loss**:
\[
\langle(\Delta\Phi)^{2}\rangle=q^{2}\int d\tau_{1}d\tau_{2}\langle\hat{E}_{I}(\tau_{1})\hat{E}_{J}(\tau_{2})\rangle\epsilon_{I}(\tau_{1})\epsilon_{J}(\tau_{2})
\]

4. **Spectral Density**:
\[
\langle\tilde{E}_{I}^{*}(\Omega)\tilde{E}_{J}(\Omega')\rangle_{\text{sym}} = 2\pi\delta(\Omega-\Omega')S_{E}(\Omega)
\]

5. **Spectral Density under Planck's Law**:
\[
[S_{IJ}^{E}(\Omega)]_{\text{Planck}}=\delta_{IJ}\frac{\Omega^{3}}{6\pi}\left(\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{e^{\beta\Omega}-1}\right)
\]
where \(\beta=\frac{\hbar}{k_{B}T}\) is the inverse temperature.

6. **Spectral Density in the Accelerating Frame**:
\[
[S_{IJ}^{E}(\Omega)]_{\text{accel}}=\delta_{IJ}\left(a^{2}\Omega+\frac{\Omega^{3}}{6\pi}\left(\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{e^{\beta\Omega}-1}\right)\right)
\]
where \(\beta = \frac{2\pi}{a}\) is the inverse Unruh temperature.

7. **Decoherence Rate**:
\[