A Review of Carsickness Mitigation: Navigating Challenges and Exploiting Opportunities in the Era of Intelligent Vehicles

Daofei Li,Tingzhe Yu,Binbin Tang
2024-02-01
Abstract:Motion sickness (MS) has long been a common complaint in road transportation. However, in the era of driving automation, MS has become an increasingly significant issue. The future intelligent vehicle is envisioned as a mobile space for work or entertainment, but unfortunately passengers' engagement in non-driving tasks may exacerbate MS. Finding effective MS countermeasures is crucial to ensure a pleasant passenger experience. Nevertheless, due to the complex mechanism of MS, there are numerous challenges in mitigating it, hindering the development of practical countermeasures. To address this, we first review two prevalent theories explaining the mechanism of MS. Subsequently, this paper provides a summary of current subjective and objective approaches for quantifying motion sickness levels. Then, it surveys existing methods for alleviating MS, including passenger adjustment, intelligent vehicle solutions, and motion cues of various modalities. Furthermore, we outline the limitations and remaining challenges of current research and highlight novel opportunities in the context of intelligent vehicles. Finally, we propose an integrated framework for alleviating MS. The findings of this review will enhance our understanding of carsickness and offer valuable insights for future research and practice in MS mitigation within modern vehicles.
Systems and Control
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily discusses strategies for alleviating Motion Sickness (MS) in the era of intelligent vehicles, particularly the exacerbation of motion sickness in passengers engaged in non-driving tasks in autonomous cars. The paper begins by reviewing two popular theories explaining the mechanisms of motion sickness—the sensory conflict theory and the postural instability theory—and analyzes the differences and limitations of these two theories in explaining the occurrence of motion sickness. The paper further summarizes the current subjective and objective methods used to quantify the level of motion sickness, including various questionnaires and the use of physiological indicators such as Electrogastrography (EGG), Electrocardiography (ECG), Electrodermal Activity (EDA), and Electroencephalography (EEG). These methods are used to assess the severity of motion sickness and predict its occurrence. Subsequently, the paper outlines the existing methods for mitigating motion sickness, divided into three categories: passenger self-adjustment strategies, intelligent vehicle solutions, and the use of different modalities of motion cues to alert passengers. Passengers can reduce the occurrence of motion sickness through habituation training, visual occlusion, finding stable external reference points, and adjusting head and body orientation. Intelligent vehicle solutions include smart cockpit design, seat and environmental control, and optimization of vehicle control strategies to reduce stimuli to passengers and improve ride comfort. Motion cueing involves using multisensory information such as visual and auditory cues to help passengers predict and understand the dynamic changes of the vehicle, thereby alleviating symptoms of motion sickness. Finally, the paper discusses the current limitations of research and future research directions, emphasizing new opportunities for alleviating motion sickness in the context of intelligent vehicles, and proposes an integrated framework aimed at combining multiple strategies to more effectively alleviate motion sickness. This review is of significant value for deepening our understanding of motion sickness, guiding future research, and practice.