Echeloned saturation and forcing axioms

Shimon Garti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/mpr.2024.a919661
2024-01-24
Abstract:Addressing a question of Paul Larson we prove the following statement. If Chang's conjecture fails, Martin's axiom holds and the continuum is greater than $\aleph_2$, there are no weakly Laver ideals over $\aleph_1$. We also prove that under Baumgartner's axiom there are no Laver ideals over $\aleph_2$.
Logic
What problem does this paper attempt to address?