My Understanding for Static and Dynamic Light Scattering

Yong Sun

2024-06-20

Abstract:The results obtained using my computing program are consistent with the values obtained twenty years ago. It also makes me believe that how to obtain particle size information using the Light Scattering technique needs to be reconsidered. Static Light Scattering (SLS) and Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) are very important techniques to study the characteristics of nano-particles in dispersion. The data of SLS is determined by the optical characteristic and the measured values of DLS are determined by optical and hydrodynamic characteristics of different size nano-particles in dispersion. Then considering the optical characteristic of nano-particles and using the SLS technique further, the size distribution can be measured accurately and is also consistent with the results measured using the TEM technique. Based on the size distribution obtained using the SLS or TEM technique and the relation between the static and hydrodynamic radii, all the expected and measured values of $g^{\left( 2\right) }\left( \tau \right) $ investigated are very well consistent. Since the data measured using the DLS technique contains the information of the optical and hydrodynamic properties of nano-particles together, therefore the accurate size distribution cannot be obtained from the experimental data of $g^{\left( 2\right) }\left( \tau \right) $ for an unknown sample. The traditional particle information: apparent hydrodynamic radius and polydispersity index measured using the DLS technique are determined by the optical and hydrodynamic characteristics and size distribution together. They cannot represent a number distribution of nano-particles in dispersion. Using the light scattering technique not only can measure the size distribution accurately but also can provide a method to understand the optical and hydrodynamic characteristics of nano-particles.

Chemical Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve mainly focus on the application and limitations of light scattering techniques (especially static light scattering (SLS) and dynamic light scattering (DLS)) in nanoparticle dispersion systems. Specifically, the paper aims to:

1. **Re - evaluate the methods for obtaining nanoparticle size information**:
- Measure the size distribution of nanoparticles by SLS technology and verify its consistency with the results of transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
- Explore how to use light scattering techniques more accurately to obtain nanoparticle size information.

2. **Analyze the limitations of DLS data**:
- The apparent hydrodynamic radius and polydispersity index measured by DLS are affected by optical and hydrodynamic characteristics as well as particle size distribution, so they cannot directly represent the number distribution of nanoparticles.
- The paper points out that since DLS data contains information on optical and hydrodynamic characteristics, it is impossible to obtain the exact particle size distribution of an unknown sample from experimental data.

3. **Establish the relationship between SLS and DLS**:
- Based on the particle size distribution measured by SLS, combined with the assumed relationship between the static radius and the hydrodynamic radius \(R_h = kR_s\), calculate and verify the consistency between the expected value and the experimental value of the normalized intensity autocorrelation function \(g^{(2)}(\tau)\) in DLS data.
- Research shows that there may be significant differences between the static radius \(R_s\) and the hydrodynamic radius \(R_h\), especially at different temperatures and scattering angles.

4. **Propose an improved method for size distribution measurement**:
- A new SLS - based method for measuring the particle size distribution of nanoparticles is proposed, which can more accurately reflect the real - size distribution of nanoparticles in the dispersion system.

### Formula Summary

- **Scattered Light Intensity Formula**:
\[
\frac{I_s}{I_{\text{inc}}} = \frac{4\pi^2 \sin^2\theta_1 n_s^2 \left(\frac{dn}{dc}\right)^2 c}{\lambda^4 r^2 4\pi \rho} \frac{\int_0^\infty R_s^6 P(q, R_s) G(R_s) dR_s}{\int_0^\infty R_s^3 G(R_s) dR_s}
\]
where:
- \(I_s\) is the scattered light intensity.
- \(I_{\text{inc}}\) is the incident light intensity.
- \(R_s\) is the static radius of the particle.
- \(q=\frac{4\pi}{\lambda}n_s\sin\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right)\) is the scattering vector.
- \(\lambda\) is the wavelength in vacuum.
- \(n_s\) is the refractive index of the solvent.
- \(\theta\) is the scattering angle.
- \(\rho\) is the particle density.
- \(r\) is the distance between the scattering particle and the measurement point.
- \(c\) is the mass concentration of the particle.
- \(\theta_1\) is the angle between the polarization direction of the incident electric field and the propagation direction of the scattering field.
- \(P(q, R_s)\) is the form factor of a homogeneous spherical particle.
- \(G(R_s)\) is the particle number distribution, assumed to be a Gaussian distribution.

- **Form Factor**:
\[
P(q, R_s)=\frac{9}{q^6 R_s^6}\left[\sin(qR_s)-qR_s\cos(qR_s)\right]^2
\]

- **Gaussian Distribution**:
\[
G(R_s; \langle R_s \rangle, \sigma)=\frac{1}{\sigma\sqrt{2\pi}}\exp\left(-\frac{(R_s - \langle R_s \rangle)^2}{2\sigma^2}\right)
\]