Comparison of spectrum models as applied to single-particle $\bf p_t$ spectra from high-energy p-p collisions and their physical interpretations

Thomas A. Trainor
2024-01-07
Abstract:A parametrized mathematical model is required to extract the information carried by transverse momentum $p_t$ spectra from high-energy nuclear collisions and subject it to physical interpretation in terms of possible hadron production mechanisms. The importance of proper model construction and implementation has increased with the emergence of claims for ``collectivity'' (flows) associated with small collision systems (e.g. $p$-$p$ and $p$-Pb). A two-element spectrum model, denoted herein as the Bylinkin model, includes an exponential element and a ``power-law'' element interpreted by the authors to represent emission from a thermalized source and from jet production respectively. Application of the Bylinkin model to various collision systems has led to conclusions about achievement of thermalization and other characteristics of nuclear dynamics. In connection with the Bylinkin model there has emerged theoretical conjecture that the thermalization mechanism signaled by the exponential element is hard processes interacting with quantum entanglement within projectile protons. Predating the Bylinkin model is a two-component (soft+hard) model (TCM) derived empirically from the evolution of $p$-$p$ spectrum data with event multiplicity as a form of data compression. The TCM has been applied to many collision systems and hadron species from which a systematic description of high-energy nuclear collisions has emerged. The Bylinkin model can be seen as a limiting case of the TCM model functions that is unsuited to represent underlying production mechanisms. The present study provides detailed comparisons of the two models for a variety of situations and contrasts two very different data interpretations that result.
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve The main problems that this paper attempts to solve are to evaluate and compare the applications and physical interpretations of two different single - particle transverse momentum spectrum models in high - energy proton - proton collisions. Specifically, the paper focuses on: 1. **Importance of model selection and construction**: - The transverse momentum spectra (\( p_t \) spectra) produced by high - energy nuclear collisions need to extract information through parameterized mathematical models and transform it into physical interpretations of possible hadron production mechanisms. - Model elements must accurately correspond to relevant physical mechanisms, especially the "collectivity" (flow) phenomenon observed in small collision systems such as \( p - p \) and \( p - Pb \) collisions. 2. **Thermalization and quantum entanglement**: - If the flow phenomenon observed in heavy - ion collisions (A - A collisions) indicates the formation of quark - gluon plasma (QGP), does QGP formation also exist in small collision systems with low particle density? - Theoretically, quantum entanglement may play a role in high - energy collisions, leading to the thermalization phenomenon. 3. **Model comparison**: - **Bylinkin model**: It contains an exponential term and a power - law term, which are respectively interpreted as heat source emission and jet production. - **Two - component model (TCM)**: Derived from the empirical evolution of data, not relying on prior assumptions, and able to describe high - energy nuclear collisions in multiple collision systems. 4. **Reliability of physical interpretations**: - Can the parameters of the Bylinkin model be physically interpreted as thermalization temperature and jet contribution? - Is the TCM model more accurate in describing the physical processes of high - energy nuclear collisions? ### Main conclusions of the paper 1. **Limitations of the Bylinkin model**: - The Bylinkin model is a special case of TCM, but its exponential term and power - law term are not strictly required by the data. - There are doubts about the physical interpretation of model parameters, especially regarding the assumptions of thermalization and quantum entanglement. 2. **Advantages of the TCM model**: - The TCM model is derived from the empirical evolution of data, not relying on prior assumptions, and can more comprehensively describe high - energy nuclear collisions in multiple collision systems. - The two components of the TCM model respectively correspond to soft processes (range dissociation) and hard processes (large - angle scattering and jet of low - \( x \) gluons). 3. **Posterior confirmation of physical mechanisms**: - After the algebraic properties of the TCM model are determined, the corresponding physical mechanisms (range dissociation and jet production) are posteriorly confirmed. ### Formula presentation - **Bylinkin model**: \[ \frac{d\sigma}{p_t dp_t}=A_{\text{th}}\exp\left[-\frac{(m_t - m_0)}{T_{\text{th}}}\right]+A_h\left(1+\frac{p_t^2}{T_h^2 N}\right)^{-N} \] - **TCM model**: \[ \frac{d\sigma}{dN dp_t}=\frac{d\sigma_0}{dN}P_0(p_t)+\frac{d\sigma_1}{dN}P_1(p_t) \] where the first term is applicable to soft or non - jet processes, and the second term represents the contribution from "low - \( x \) QCD jets". Through the comparison and analysis of these models, the paper aims to provide a deeper understanding of the physical mechanisms in high - energy nuclear collisions and question some conclusions based on the Bylinkin model.