Genomic comparison of urothelial mucinous adenocarcinoma and colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma biomarkers and therapeutic implications.

Irasema Concepcion Paster,Kenneth Barker,Ana Jose Fernandez,Jose Guillen-Rodriguez,Juan Chipollini,Alejandro Recio-Boiles
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.650
IF: 45.3
2024-01-31
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:650 Background: Urothelial mucinous adenocarcinoma (UC-MUC-AC), arising from the urothelium, is a rare condition ( 0.05). In the second analysis, the ANOVA overall model comparing gene expression between the histological groups 1, 2 & 5 was statistically significant (p=0.0018). The Dunnett test revealed a farther difference between Group 2, UC nonTCC-nonMUC adenocarcinoma, and 5, CRC non-MUC-AC (p-value =0.001), but closest between Group 2 and 1, UC-TCC-nonMUC-nonAC (p =0.100). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that next-generation sequencing technology has the potential to aid in treatment decisions based on the site of origin, such as UC-AC, rather than relying on traditional histopathological descriptive approaches for extrapolating evidence from treatment protocols used for other cancer origins like CRC. Future research on artificial intelligence could aid physicians with more informed treatment decisions by providing additional insight into how closely tumors match cancer types' genomic and transcriptomic signatures.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?