Estimating individual contributions to team success in women's college volleyball

Scott Powers,Luke Stancil,Naomi Consiglio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.01083
2024-02-02
Applications
Abstract:The progression of a single point in volleyball starts with a serve and then alternates between teams, each team allowed up to three contacts with the ball. Using charted data from the 2022 NCAA Division I women's volleyball season (4,147 matches, 600,000+ points, more than 5 million recorded contacts), we model the progression of a point as a Markov chain with the state space defined by the sequence of contacts in the current volley. We estimate the probability of each team winning the point, which changes on each contact. We attribute changes in point probability to the player(s) responsible for each contact, facilitating measurement of performance on the point scale for different skills. Traditional volleyball statistics do not allow apples-to-apples comparisons across skills, and they do not measure the impact of the performances on team success. For adversarial contacts (serve/receive and attack/block/dig), we estimate a hierarchical linear model for the outcome, with random effects for the players involved; and we adjust performance for strength of schedule not only on the conference/team level but on the individual player level. We can use the results to answer practical questions for volleyball coaches.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is the evaluation of each player's contribution to team success in volleyball matches. Specifically, the authors analyze data from the 2022 NCAA women's volleyball season (including 4,147 matches, over 600,000 scoring points, and over 5 million recorded touches) using a Markov chain model to simulate the development process of each scoring point and estimate the probability changes of each team winning the point after each touch. Additionally, the authors use a hierarchical linear model (with random effects) to assess the performance of different skills and adjust performance evaluations based on the strength of the opponents faced by the players. The main contributions of the paper are: 1. **Quantifying the impact of individual performance on team success**: By attributing the change in scoring probability after each touch to the player responsible for that touch, the paper can measure the performance of different skills in terms of scoring units, allowing for cross-skill comparisons. 2. **Adjusting for the intensity of competition**: The paper adjusts performance evaluations not only at the conference/team level but also at the individual player level, considering the strength differences of various opponents, which helps in more fairly assessing player performance. The application of these methods can provide practical decision support for volleyball coaches, such as in player recruitment and match strategy formulation.