Abstract:At the present time, consumers often disclose their privacy when using online platforms to receive personalized recommendation information and services, but they are also highly concerned whether their privacy is being violated. “Privacy paradox” is becoming a hot topic of research. What are the potential impacts of individual cognitive differences and situational cues on privacy decision-making? How to balance the internal causes of the “privacy paradox” so that consumers are more willing to accept personalized recommendation services based on users’ privacy data? Can the transparency of privacy rights ease user conflict perceptions and promote disclosure intentions? These questions are inconclusive. Therefore, the purpose of this our research was to explore consumer privacy paradoxical behaviors from a novel perspective of the characteristics of authorization cues, and to clarify the internal relationship between individual cognitive processing and privacy authorization cues. This study suggests that the big data platform, when collecting or using user information, should try to reduce the behaviors that induce users’ resistance. It also provides a reference for how to better achieve benign interaction in personalized recommendation between Internet companies and users. The event-related potential technique is adopted to explore the matching relationship between individual cognitive processing and privacy authorization cues and to analyze the internal neural mechanism of the personalized recommendation user in the authorization decision. The experiment simulated the privacy authorization situation, and adopted a 2 × 2 × 2 hybrid experimental design: authority sensitivity (high/low) * authorization transparency (with/without permission) * cognitive style (field dependent/field independent). The experimental results show that: (1) Authorization transparency, authority sensitivity and their interactions will affect the user’s privacy authorization behaviors, and the interaction of the two cues has a greater impact on the behavior than the role of a single cue; (2) The cognitive style will affect the individual’s attention resource allocation in the authorization scenario, which, limited by cognitive resources, will result in selective attention to contextual cues: Compared with the field-independent group with self-characterization as a reference, the field-dependent group induced a greater P2 amplitude; (3) When the two-cue valences in the authoritative scenario are inconsistent, the amplitude of the N2 component is greater than that when the valences are consistent, and the amplitude of the N2 induced by the field-dependent group is more affected by the scenario cue valence; (4) Regardless of whether it is a field-dependent group or a field-independent group, there is no salient difference in the amplitude of LPP components induced in each scenario. According to the results of this study, even if privacy authorization involves high risks, individuals tend to selectively seek supportive cues or avoid obtaining information that is inconsistent with their cognition. This research reveals the differences of neural mechanisms in users’ actual decision-making, provides the possibility for further exploration of the black box behind users’ attitudes and behaviors, and opens up new ideas for the study of the “privacy paradox.”

An Empathy-Based Sandbox Approach to Bridge the Privacy Gap among Attitudes, Goals, Knowledge, and Behaviors

Why am I seeing this: Democratizing End User Auditing for Online Content Recommendations

Identifying Privacy Personas

PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Action

Exploring the Impact of Social Robot Design Characteristics on Users' Privacy Concerns: Evidence from PLS-SEM and FsQCA

A Personal Privacy Preserving Framework

Achieving a Balance Between Privacy Protection and Data Collection: A Field Experimental Examination of a Theory-Driven Information Technology Solution

Leveraging privacy profiles to empower users in the digital society

Are Personalized Stochastic Parrots More Dangerous? Evaluating Persona Biases in Dialogue Systems

An ERP Experimental Study About the Effect of Authorization Cue Characteristics on the Privacy Behavior of Recommended Users

Revealing Persona Biases in Dialogue Systems

The Privacy Pillar -- A Conceptual Framework for Foundation Model-based Systems

The Robot Privacy Paradox: Understanding How Privacy Concerns Shape Intentions to Use Social Robots

Research on the cognitive neural mechanism of privacy empowerment illusion cues regarding comprehensibility and interpretability for privacy disclosures

Transformative privacy calculus: Conceptualizing the personalization‐privacy paradox on social media

Experts-in-the-Loop: Establishing an Effective Workflow in Crafting Privacy Q&A

Embedding Privacy in Computational Social Science and Artificial Intelligence Research

Examining the Intention of Authorization via Apps: Personality Traits and Expanded Privacy Calculus Perspectives

The Fire Thief Is Also the Keeper: Balancing Usability and Privacy in Prompts

Privacy-Preserving Behaviour of Chatbot Users: Steering Through Trust Dynamics

Conceptualizing Online Social Networking Privacy Concerns