Abstract:When an initially neutral stimulus has been paired in Pavlovian fashion with an appetitive outcome such as food, noncontingent presentation of this conditioned stimulus (CS) can enhance ongoing instrumental responding, a phenomenon termed Pavlovian-instrumental transfer (PIT). In its simplest form, PIT is assessed by presenting a CS for food while the subject is responding in extinction on a single lever for the same food. It has previously been shown that the nucleus accumbens, and particularly the core subdivision, is critical for this form of PIT (Hall et al., 1999, Soc. Neuro. Abstr. 25, P41.2). However, behavioural studies have shown that PIT can be subdivided into a general, motivating effect of the Pavlovian CS, and a response-specific PIT effect, seen as a further enhancement when the Pavlovian and instrumental outcomes are the same (see Dickinson & Balleine, 1994, Anim. L. Behav., 22, 1-18). In the present study, rats received lesions to the core or shell of the nucleus accumbens before being tested on a response-specific PIT task. In the Pavlovian phase, stimulus CS(pel) was paired with pellet delivery, while stimulus CS(suc) was paired with sucrose solution. The subjects were then trained to respond on two levers, with one lever producing pellets and the other producing sucrose. On test, lever-pressing was recorded in extinction while the stimuli were presented noncontingently. Sham-operated subjects (n = 6) showed a selective enhancement of lever-pressing on the lever paired with the same outcome as the Pavlovian CS; this is the response-specific PIT effect. Core-lesioned subjects (n = 4) showed a general enhancement of responding during the CS, but this was not specific to one response. Shell-lesioned animals (n = 4) showed no Pavlovian-instrumental transfer. It is sug- gested that in this task, the shell is required for the 'vigour' and the core for the 'direction' of the potentiation of responding by a noncontin- gent, appetitive stimulus. This pattern closely resembles that previously observed for the potentiation of responding for conditioned rein-

Both probability and rate of reinforcement can affect the acquisition and maintenance of conditioned responses.

Information, certainty, and learning.

Acquisition With Partial and Continuous Reinforcement in Rat Magazine Approach.

Theory of reinforcement schedules

Pavlovian learning and conditioned reinforcement

Acquisition with partial and continuous reinforcement in pigeon autoshaping

Manipulations of the context-response relationship reduce the expression of response habits

Instrumental behavior in humans is sensitive to the correlation between response rate and reward rate

Stimulus conditions that promote habitual control

Learning about trial sequences disrupts the partial reinforcement extinction effect in classical conditioning.

Reinforcer value moderates response magnitude and persistence during extinction: A randomized trial

A preliminary study of training conditions necessary for secondary reinforcement.

Reward and punishment contingency shifting reveals distinct roles for VTA dopamine and GABA neurons in behavioral flexibility

Probability of shock in the presence and absence of cs in fear conditioning.

Dissociable Effects of D-Amphetamine, Chlordiazepoxide and Alpha-Flupenthixol on Choice and Rate Measures of Reinforcement in the Rat.

The role of uncertainty in regulating associative change.

Reward timescale controls the rate of behavioral and dopaminergic learning

Dynamic shaping of dopamine signals during probabilistic Pavlovian conditioning

Relative Roles of Ventral Striatal D(1) and D(2) Dopamine-Receptors in Responding with Conditioned Reinforcement

Influence of reinforcement and its omission on trial‐by‐trial changes of response bias in perceptual decision making

Effects of Lesions of the Nucleus Accumbens Core and Shell on Response-Specific Pavlovian- Instrumental Transfer