Abstract:To increase their conservation value, future non‐lethal nest protection experiments should whenever possible clearly state overall aims, take place over multiple seasons, use a comparable control and test non‐lethal protection methods independently of lethal predator control. Greater focus is required on under‐studied taxa such as cup‐nesting songbirds and birds in South America, Africa and Asia, and novel protection techniques such as deterrents and chemical camouflage. Practitioners should consider the evidence we synthesise here when deciding whether non‐lethal nest protection approaches are optimal for their study system, to increase conservation success and reduce ethical and financial costs. Implementing effective, affordable and ethical conservation management will be crucial for minimising future biodiversity losses. Such management requires reliable foundational evidence to help managers make informed choices about how to address the needs of their target species. Unfortunately, such evidence is still lacking for many species and management scenarios. One major global challenge is improving the reproductive success of threatened species in the context of predation. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of in situ experiments that used non‐lethal methods to protect bird nests against predators, with the aims of summarising global trends in nest protection efforts, comparing the effectiveness of different protection measures and informing future research and management. We considered peer‐reviewed studies in English. We detected a large geographic and taxonomic bias in the evidence base with 58% of articles conducted in North America and 76% on ground‐nesting birds. Less than 3% of articles involved taxa listed as Endangered or Critically Endangered and 51% of study units lasted just a single breeding season. Nests protected with exclosures, fences and guards were more likely to be successful than their unprotected controls. Interventions involving deterrents, conditioned taste aversion, chemical camouflage and diversionary feeding did not have a significant positive effect on nest success, but the interventions in these categories were less common and more diverse in nature. Synthesis and applications. To increase their conservation value, future non‐lethal nest protection experiments should whenever possible clearly state overall aims, take place over multiple seasons, use a comparable control and test non‐lethal protection methods independently of lethal predator control. Greater focus is required on under‐studied taxa such as cup‐nesting songbirds and birds in South America, Africa and Asia, and novel protection techniques such as deterrents and chemical camouflage. Practitioners should consider the evidence we synthesise here when deciding whether non‐lethal nest protection approaches are optimal for their study system, to increase conservation success and reduce ethical and financial costs.

Parasites, predators and nest boxes: facts and artefacts in nest box studies of birds?

Use of anthropogenic material affects bird nest arthropod community structure: influence of urbanisation, and consequences for ectoparasites and fledging success

Nest architecture influences host use by avian brood parasites and is shaped by coevolutionary dynamics

Species specific effect of nest-box cleaning on settlement selection decisions in an artificial colony system

Protecting wild bird nests against predators: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of non‐lethal methods

Urbanisation and nest building in birds: a review of threats and opportunities

Why do some bird species incorporate more anthropogenic materials into their nests than others?

The evolution of nest site use and nest architecture in modern birds and their ancestors

Can nest design hinder brood parasitism success?

The extended avian urban phenotype: anthropogenic solid waste pollution, nest design, and fitness

Global drivers of variation in cup nest size in passerine birds

Nest predation and climate change as drivers of alternative reproductive tactics in a migratory species

Anthropogenic nest material use in a global sample of birds

Bird traits and their nutrient impact on terrestrial invertebrate populations

Nest defence behavioural reaction norms: testing life-history and parental investment theory predictions

Anti-parasite behaviour of birds

Ecological correlates of alternative reproductive tactics: conspecific brood parasitism rates vary with nest predation and seasonal effects influenced by climate change

Understanding spatiotemporal effects of food supplementation on host–parasite interactions using community‐based science

Predation Patterns on Artificial Nests of Ground Nesting Pheasants in the Montane Forest, Southwest China

Nest construction and its effect on post-hatching family life in the burying beetle

Sex-dependent recognition and behavior against nest predators and brood parasites by Chestnut-capped Blackbird Chrysomus ruficapillus