Abstract:Hydropower is one of most widely used means of energy generation.Although it is being increasingly adopted worldwide,the impacts of hydropower development vary at local,regional,and global scales.To reduce the negative effects and promote sustainability of hydropower development,it is essential to identify the costs and benefits of these projects,and to determine a reasonable distribution of profits among stakeholders.The costs and benefits of hydropower development for different stakeholders depend on the ecosystem services available to each of them.Ecological changes produce different opportunity costs for stakeholders in terms of their livelihood and development.Thus,cost-benefit analysis is a key tool for evaluating the sustainability of a hydropower construction project.Lancang River is a well-known international river that is rich in water resources.In China,it is an important energy base for the strategic objectives of the "Bonanza" and "WestEast Gas Transmission" initiatives,with the Lancang River considered to have great developmental potential.Therefore,we selected the Lancang River central stream hydropower development project for the present study.Evaluation indexes were based on the availability of data and were utilized to assess the reallocation of hydropower development benefits among four stakeholders:enterprises,migrant farmers,local government,and global beneficiaries.An index system was established to reflect and compare the costs and benefits for the different stakeholders;data were converted into Chinese yuan for ease of comparison.Spending costs by enterprises included construction investment and operating costs,whereas the benefits mainly accrued from power generation.The costs for migrant farmers comprised relocation fees and income loss;benefits included resettlement subsidies and reduced spending on electricity use.For the local government,the main cost was the lost value of ecosystem services due to flooding,and,in addition to the environmental benefits and potential economic value of hydropower development,the benefits included land compensation paid by enterprises.The main cost for global beneficiaries was the lost value of ecosystem services,and the main benefit was the environmental value of alternative energy.The results of the cost-benefit analyses were as follows.In the construction of the hydropower development,the total cost to enterprises was 9.91 billion yuan/year,and the total benefit was 38.91 billion yuan/year.The cost for migrant farmers was 0.06 billion yuan/year,and the benefit was 0.04 billion yuan/year.The cost for local government was 0.74 billion yuan/year,and the benefit was 2.28 billion yuan/year.The cost for global beneficiaries was 0.51 billion yuan/year,while the benefit was 6.65 billion yuan/year.Therefore,the overall benefits of the project exceeded the overall costs in a 4.27∶1 ratio.The cost-benefit ratios for enterprises,local government,and global beneficiaries were 1∶3.93,1∶3.10,and 1∶13.11,respectively;thus,the benefits of hydropower development exceeded the costs for these stakeholders.However,the costs exceeded the benefits for migrant farmers at a ratio of 1.48∶ 1.To maintain the farmers' net income,enterprises,local government,and global beneficiaries would need to increase the amount of eco-compensation paid.The results reveal that conducting separate costbenefit analyses clarifies the effects as well as the flow of profits derived from such projects for different stakeholders,and can be utilized to reduce the negative impacts of hydropower developments.

Sector-level socio-economic and environmental effects of large-scale hydropower initiatives -- a multi-region multi-phase model for the Wudongde Hydropower Station

Scenario Simulation and Efficiency Study of Hydropower Development to Promote Regional Sustainable Development: An Empirical Analysis of a Province in Southwestern China

Socioeconomic impacts of hydropower development on the Yibin–Chongqing section, upper reaches of the Yangtze River

Cumulative Environmental Effects of Hydropower Stations Based on the Water Footprint Method—Yalong River Basin, China

Water-energy-ecosystem nexus modeling using multi-objective, non-linear programming in a regulated river: Exploring tradeoffs among environmental flows, cascaded small hydropower, and inter-basin water diversion projects

Phase-based Externality Analysis for Large Hydropower Projects

Analysis of the trade-off between hydroelectricity generation and ecological protection from the perspective of eco-efficiency in Southwest China

Emergy-based sustainability evaluation model of hydropower megaproject incorporating the social-economic-ecological losses

Economic cost-benefit analysis of a hydropower development project based on different stakeholders: A case study of Lancang River, China

Installed Hydropower Capacity and Carbon Emission Reduction Efficiency Based on the EBM Method in China

Impacts of Large Hydropower Projects on the Ecological Environment of Watersheds: A Case Study of Ertan Reservoir Area

Embodied carbon emissions induced by the construction of hydropower infrastructure in China

Framework for a more balanced consideration of hydropower development through ecosystem services assessment

Effects of ENSO on Hydrological Process and Hydropower Across the Lancang‐Mekong River Basin

Quantifying the Impacts of Small Dam Construction on Hydrological Alterations in the Jiulong River Basin of Southeast China

Projection of Climate Change Impacts on Hydropower in the Source Region of the Yangtze River Based on CMIP6

A Global-Scale Framework for Hydropower Development Incorporating Strict Environmental Constraints

An Externality Evaluation Model for Hydropower Projects: A Case Study of the Three Gorges Project

Long-Term Scheduling of Provincial Power Grid With Rich Hydropower

Impact of local environmental standards on water environmental carrying capacity in large water diversion project: A system dynamics analysis in Shandong, China

Decarbonization of China's Electricity Systems with Hydropower Penetration and Pumped-Hydro Storage: Comparing the Policies with a Techno-Economic Analysis