Strychnine‐induced potassium current in isolated dorsal root ganglion cells of the rat

K. Aibara,M. Oonuma,N. Akaike
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1991.tb12199.x
IF: 7.3
1991-02-01
British Journal of Pharmacology
Abstract:1 Effects of strychnine (Str) on the dissociated dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cells of the rat have been investigated in whole‐cells configuration by a conventional patch‐clamp technique. 2 γ‐Aminobutyric acid (GABA)‐induced Cl− current (ICl) increased sigmoidally with increasing concentration. The half‐maximal response (Ka) was 3 × 10−5 m and the Hill coefficient was 1.5. Both Str and bicuculline inhibited the GABA‐induced ICl in a concentration‐dependent manner. 3 Str itself could elicit the current at concentrations over 10−5 m, at which concentrations the GABA response was completely suppressed. The concentration‐response curve for the Str‐induced current was bell‐shaped, and a nearly maximum response occurred at 3 × 10−4 m. A transient ‘hump’ current appeared immediately after the wash‐out of external solution containing high concentrations of Str over 3 × 10−4 m. 4 The Str‐induced outward current and a transient ‘hump’ current were augmented by the removal of extracellular K+ and were suppressed by the substitution of intracellular K+ for Cs+. But the current was not sensitive to extracellular Na+, Ca2+ and Cl−. 5 The reversal potential of Str‐induced current (EStr) was −75 mV, which was close to the K+ equilibrium potential (EK = −76.3 mV). The change of EStr for a ten fold change in extracellular K+ concentration was 58 mV, indicating that the membrane behaves like a K+ electrode in the presence of Str. The reversal potential of the ‘hump’ current was also close to EK. 6 The Str‐induced outward current was antagonized by K+ channel blockers such as Ba2+, tetraethylammonium (TEA)‐chloride, and 4‐aminopyridine (4‐AP) in a concentration‐dependent manner. 7 The Str‐induced K+ current was not affected by internal perfusion of bis(γ‐aminophenoxy)ethane‐N,N,N′,N‐tetraacetic acid (BAPTA), indicating that the Str response does not result in the activation of K+ conductance by the intracellular Ca2+.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?