Abstract:Statement of problem Different digital methods have been described for transferring the maxillary cast into a virtual articulator; however, its accuracy remains uncertain. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator by using analog and digital methods. Material and methods A maxillary typodont with 5 markers was positioned into a mannequin, which was digitized by using an industrial scanner (ATOS Q) and an extraoral scan of the typodont obtained (T710). Three groups were created based on the technique used to transfer the maxillary cast into the virtual articulator (Panadent PCH Articulator): conventional facebow record (CNV group), digital photograph (P group), and facial scanning (FS group) (n=10). In the CNV group, conventional facebow records (Kois Dentofacial analyzer system) were digitized (T710) and used to mount the maxillary scan into the articulator by aligning it with the reference platform (Kois adjustable platform) (DentalCAD). In the P group, photographs with the reference glasses (Kois Reference Glasses 3.0) were positioned in the mannequin. Each photograph was superimposed with the maxillary scan. Then, the maxillary scan was transferred into the virtual articulator by using the true horizontal plane information of the photograph. In the FS group, facial scans with an extraoral scan body (Kois Scan Body) were positioned in the mannequin by using a facial scanner (Instarisa). The extraoral scan body was digitized by using the same extraoral scanner. The digitized extraoral scan body provided the true horizontal plane information that was used to mount the maxillary scan into the articulator, along with the Kois disposable tray of the scan body. On the reference scan and each specimen, 15 linear measurements between the markers of the maxillary scans and the horizontal plane of the virtual articulator and 3 linear measurements between the maxillary dental midline and articulator midline were calculated. The measurements of the reference scan were used as a control to assess trueness and precision. Trueness was analyzed by using 1-way ANOVA followed by the pairwise comparison Tukey tests (α=.05). Precision was evaluated by using the Levene and pairwise comparisons Wilcoxon Rank sum tests. Results No significant trueness ( P =.996) or precision ( P =.430) midline discrepancies were found. Significant posterior right ( P <.001), anterior ( P =.005), posterior left ( P <.001), and overall ( P <.001) trueness discrepancies were revealed among the groups. The P group obtained the best posterior right, posterior left, and overall trueness and precision. The P and FS groups demonstrated the best anterior trueness, but no anterior precision discrepancies were found. Conclusions The techniques tested affected the accuracy of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator. In the majority of the parameters assessed, the photography method tested showed the best trueness and precision values. However, the maxillary cast transfer accuracy ranged from 137 ±44 μm to 453 ±176 μm among the techniques tested.

Direct transfer of the position of digitized casts to a virtual articulator

An overview of the different digital facebow methods for transferring the maxillary cast into the virtual articulator

Comparison of the accuracy of a 3-dimensional virtual method and the conventional method for transferring the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator

Mounting digital casts on a virtual articulator by using two-dimensional facial photographs with a facebow: A technique

Accuracy of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator by using analog and digital facebow record methods

Accuracy comparison of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator between an analog facebow record and a digital photography technique

Virtual Dental Articulation Using Computed Tomography Data and Motion Tracking

The 4D virtual patient: A proof of concept in digital dentistry

A digital approach to the evaluation of mandibular position by using a virtual articulator

The Accuracy of Transferring Casts in Maximal Intercuspal Position to a Virtual Articulator.

Digital Mounting Jigs: A Novel Technique

Improving the accuracy of complete arch implant intraoral digital scans by using horizontal scan bodies with occlusal geometry: A dental technique

Improving the accuracy of complete arch implant digital scans by using auxiliary clips for intraoral scan bodies: A dental technique

Cast-free modified digital twin-stage technique for complete mouth rehabilitation: A dental technique

Using a three-dimensional natural head position precise recording and transferring device to translate the natural head position into a 3-dimensional virtual patient: A dental technique

Reverse scan body: Complete digital workflow for double full-arch zirconia prostheses

Face-bow record without a third point of reference: theoretical considerations and an alternative technique

Electronic Surveying of Digital Partially Dentate Casts

Perfect digital impression of natural abutment teeth without using retraction cords

Reproduction accuracy of articulator mounting with an arbitrary face-bow vs. average values-a controlled, randomized, blinded patient simulator study

Three-point Sectional-Cast Digital Method for Transferring the Interocclusal Relationship for Full-Mouth Rehabilitation of Worn Dentition.