Abstract:<p>Given instances (spatial points) of different spatial features (categories), significant spatial co-distribution pattern discovery aims to find subsets of spatial features whose spatial distributions are statistically significantly similar to each other. Discovering significant spatial co-distribution patterns is important for many application domains such as identifying spatial associations between diseases and risk factors in spatial epidemiology. Previous methods mostly associated spatial features whose instances are frequently located together; however, this does not necessarily indicate a similarity in the spatial distributions between different features. Thus, this paper defines the significant spatial co-distribution pattern discovery problem and subsequently develops a novel method to solve it effectively. First, we propose a new measure, dissimilarity index, to quantify the difference between spatial distributions of different features under the spatial neighbor relation and then employ it in a distribution clustering method to detect candidate spatial co-distribution patterns. To further remove spurious patterns that occur accidentally, the validity of each candidate spatial co-distribution pattern is verified through a significance test under the null hypothesis that spatial distributions of different features are independent of each other. To model the null hypothesis, a distribution shift-correction method is presented by randomizing the relationships between different features and maintaining spatial structure of each feature (e.g., spatial auto-correlation). Comparisons with baseline methods using synthetic datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. A case study identifying co-morbidities in central Colorado is also presented to illustrate the real-world applicability of the proposed method.</p>

Spatial clusters in a global-dependence model

[Scan Statistic Theory and Its Application in Spatial Epidemiology].

Spatial Autocorrelation among Automated Geocoding Errors and Its Effects on Testing for Disease Clustering

Spatial cluster detection of regression coefficients in a mixed‐effects model

A Spatial Scan Statistic for Multiple Clusters.

Spatial Clustering of the Failure to Geocode and Its Implications for the Detection of Disease Clustering

Reclaiming independence in spatial‐clustering datasets: A series of data‐driven spatial weights matrices

A Spatial Scan Statistic for Nonisotropic Two-Level Risk Cluster

A Mixture Scan Statistic for Semi-continuous Data with Covariates and Spatial Correlation

Spatially Clustered Regression

Detection of Local Differences in Spatial Characteristics Between Two Spatiotemporal Random Fields

Detection of Spatial Heterogeneity Based on Spatial Autoregressive Varying Coefficient Models

Clustering Spatially Correlated Functional Data with Multiple Scalar Covariates.

Bayesian statistics in spatial epidemiology]

A False Discovery Approach for Scanning Spatial Disease Clusters with Arbitrary Shapes

Significant spatial co-distribution pattern discovery

Multivariate Normal Spatial Scan Statistic for Detecting the Most Severe Cluster of a Disease

An empirical likelihood approach for detecting spatial clusters of continuous data

Accounting for spatial correlation in the scan statistic

Clustered Factor Analysis for Multivariate Spatial Data

Evaluation of hotspot cluster detection using spatial scan statistic based on exact counting