Abstract:Abstract Context Spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models are increasingly popular for analyzing wildlife monitoring data. SCR can account for spatial heterogeneity in detection that arises from individual space use (detection kernel), variation in the sampling process, and the distribution of individuals (density). However, unexplained and unmodeled spatial heterogeneity in detectability may remain due to cryptic factors, both intrinsic and extrinsic to the study system. This is the case, for example, when covariates coding for variable effort and detection probability in general are incomplete or entirely lacking. Objectives We identify how the magnitude and configuration of unmodeled, spatially variable detection probability influence SCR parameter estimates. Methods We simulated SCR data with spatially variable and autocorrelated detection probability. We then fitted an SCR model ignoring this variation to the simulated data and assessed the impact of model misspecification on inferences. Results Highly-autocorrelated spatial heterogeneity in detection probability (Moran’s I = 0.85–0.96), modulated by the magnitude of the unmodeled heterogeneity, can lead to pronounced negative bias (up to 65%, or about 44-fold decrease compared to the reference scenario), reduction in precision (249% or 2.5-fold) and coverage probability of the 95% credible intervals associated with abundance estimates to 0. Conversely, at low levels of spatial autocorrelation (median Moran’s I = 0), even severe unmodeled heterogeneity in detection probability did not lead to pronounced bias and only caused slight reductions in precision and coverage of abundance estimates. Conclusions Unknown and unmodeled variation in detection probability is liable to be the norm, rather than the exception, in SCR studies. We encourage practitioners to consider the impact that spatial autocorrelation in detectability has on their inferences and urge the development of SCR methods that can take structured, unknown or partially unknown spatial variability in detection probability into account.

Accounting for spatial correlation in the scan statistic

[Scan Statistic Theory and Its Application in Spatial Epidemiology].

A Mixture Scan Statistic for Semi-continuous Data with Covariates and Spatial Correlation

A Spatial Scan Statistic for Nonisotropic Two-Level Risk Cluster

Spatial Autocorrelation among Automated Geocoding Errors and Its Effects on Testing for Disease Clustering

A Spatial Scan Statistic for Multiple Clusters.

A functional-model-adjusted spatial scan statistic

Likelihood-based Estimation of Spatial Intensity and Variation in Disease Risk from Locations Observed with Error

Spatio-Temporal Disease Surveillance: Forward Selection Scan Statistic

A Standardized Scan Statistic for Detecting Spatial Clusters with Estimated Parameters

A Bayesian shared-frailty spatial scan statistic model for time-to-event data

An expectation-based space-time scan statistic for ZIP-distributed data

An empirical likelihood approach for detecting spatial clusters of continuous data

Consequences of ignoring variable and spatially autocorrelated detection probability in spatial capture-recapture

A False Discovery Approach for Scanning Spatial Disease Clusters with Arbitrary Shapes

A log-Weibull spatial scan statistic for time to event data

The Kernel Spatial Scan Statistic

Estimating Spatial Variation in Disease Risk from Locations Coarsened by Incomplete Geocoding

Irregular Shaped Small Nodule Detection Using a Robust Scan Statistic

Investigating spatial scan statistics for multivariate functional data

Multivariate Normal Spatial Scan Statistic for Detecting the Most Severe Cluster of a Disease