Abstract:Introduction: The trend toward requiring explicit consent from patients participating in observational research increases time and resources required to perform such research. Informed consent introduces the potential for “consent bias”—either through selection bias or through the “Hawthorne effect,” where patients may alter responses based upon the awareness of participation in a study, thus potentially limiting its applicability to a generalized orthopedic practice. We hypothesized that administering Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) to patients on the day of surgery with informed consent would alter responses in a statistically and clinically meaningful way compared to patients who complete QuickDASH as a quality control measure. Methods: We previously instituted the QuickDASH questionnaire as the standard new patient intake and postoperative questionnaire for quality assurance purposes. We retrospectively reviewed data on a cohort of patients who underwent isolated carpal tunnel release (CTR) who had completed preoperative and postoperative QuickDASH forms without providing consent for study participation. Next, a cohort of patients scheduled to undergo isolated CTR who completed the intake questionnaire was approached on the day of surgery for consent to participate in the study. After obtaining consent but prior to surgery, these patients completed a second questionnaire and then completed a postoperative questionnaire on follow-up at a mean of 8 weeks postoperatively. Results: Thirty-nine patients and 35 patients were included in the retrospective and prospective cohorts, respectively. No significant differences were observed in age, gender, symptom duration, nerve conduction study/electromyography results, or disease severity between the two groups. We identified no statistically significant difference in preoperative or postoperative QuickDASH score between the retrospective and prospective cohorts (39.8 ± 22.7 vs. 39.7 ± 19.1 preoperatively; 27.3 ± 24.7 vs. 18.7 ± 13.3 postoperatively) or within the prospective cohort before and after obtaining informed consent. Conclusion: Informed consent did not significantly alter patient responses to the QuickDASH questionnaire. These results suggest that both “opt-in” and “opt-out” approaches to observational research in hand surgery provide results that may be applicable to a generalized orthopedic practice. Clinical Relevance: This study provides evidence that will inform the interpretation of observational research findings in hand surgery.

Occurrence of pathogens in raw and ready-to-eat meat and poultry products collected from the retail marketplace in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Validity of QuickDASH at day of surgery versus day of initial consultation: Does informed consent make a difference?

Relationship of anesthesia to postoperative personality changes in children

Assessing the quality of consent in elective hip and knee arthroplasty: Do modern orthopaedic surgeons make the cut?

The effect of standardized patient feedback in teaching surgical residents informed consent: results of a pilot study

Informing the process of consent for surgery: identification of key constructs and quality factors

Improving risk communication: a proof-of-concept randomised control trial assessing the impact of visual aids for neurosurgical consent

Patient consent in the post-Montgomery era: A national multi-speciality prospective study

Improving the process of informed consent for percutaneous coronary intervention: patient outcomes from the Patient Risk Information Services Manager (ePRISM) study

Informed consent for strabismus surgery: the importance of patient information sheets

Abstract WP95: The Effectiveness of Remote Informed Consent for Clinical Intervention in the Setting of Acute Ischemic Stroke

Informed consent for inguinal herniorrhaphy and cholecystectomy: describing how patients make decisions to have surgery

Replication of vaccinia DNA in mouse L cells. IV. Protein synthesis and viral DNA replication.

Longitudinal Informed Consent Competency in Stable Community Patients with Schizophrenia: A One-Week Training and One-Year Follow-Up Study

MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTILE FORCE IN EXPERIMENTAL HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK. SOME OBSERVATIONS.

Percutaneous coronary intervention patients' and cardiologists' experiences of the informed consent process in Northern England: a qualitative study

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Consent for Patients Undergoing Transobturator Slings

Reevaluating Informed Consent: Integrating Shared Decision-Making into Spinal Surgery for Better Patient Outcomes

Is there an impact of a video-based patient informed consent in elective hand surgery?

Assessing Public-Reported Perceptions of Low-Risk Hand Surgery Provided in the Office Versus an Ambulatory Surgery Center: Survey Study

Multimedia patient education to assist the informed consent process for knee arthroscopy