Abstract:This guideline is the result of a collaborative effort among the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP) and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance (PPPIA). A comprehensive literature review was conducted on pressure ulcer prevention and treatment. A rigorous scientific methodology was used to appraise available research and make evidence-based recommendations for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. Draft guidelines were made available to 986 invited stakeholder individuals and organizations/societies and stakeholder feedback was considered by the guideline developers. In the final development process, the guideline development team used a consensus voting process (GRADE) to assign strengths of recommendation. Strength of recommendations indicate the extent to which one can be confident that adherence to a recommendation will do more good than harm, and are indented to assist the health professional to prioritize interventions. The guideline includes 575 explicit recommendations and/or research summaries for the following pressure ulcer topics: etiology; prevalence and incidence; risk assessment; skin and tissue assessment; preventive skin care; prophylactic dressings; microclimate control; fabrics and textiles; nutrition; repositioning and early mobilization; support surfaces; medical device related pressure ulcers; pressure ulcer classification; wound assessment; monitoring of healing; pain assessment and treatment; cleansing; debridement; wound dressings (including growth factors and biological wound dressings); assessment and treatment of infection and biofilms; biophysical agents (e.g. electrical stimulation, negative pressure wound therapy, electromagnetic field treatment); and surgery. Additional sections address the specific needs of special populations including bariatric individuals, critically ill individuals, older adults, pediatric individuals, individuals in palliative care and individuals in the operating room setting. The guideline includes sections to assist in implementing the guideline within organizations, including quality improvement strategies, quality indicators, health professional education and recommendations to assist patient consumers. The guideline also includes the NPUAP/EPUAP International Pressure Ulcer Classification system, complete with full Category/Stage descriptions and illustrative photography. CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE INTRODUCTION 3 Strengths of Evidence and Strengths of Recommendations Full explanation of the methodology is available in Appendix 1: Guideline Methodology. Individual studies were assigned a ‘level of evidence’ based on study design and quality. The body of evidence supporting each recommendation was given a ‘strength of evidence’. A consensus voting process (GRADE) involving all the experts formally engaged in the guideline development was used to assign a ‘strength of recommendation’ that indicates the confidence the health professional can have that the recommended practice will improve patient outcomes (i.e., do more good than harm). The overall aim of the ‘strength of recommendation’ is to help health professionals to prioritize interventions. Strengths of Evidence A The recommendation is supported by direct scientific evidence from properly designed and implemented controlled trials on pressure ulcers in humans (or humans at risk for pressure ulcers), providing statistical results that consistently support the recommendation (Level 1 studies required). B The recommendation is supported by direct scientific evidence from properly designed and implemented clinical series on pressure ulcers in humans (or humans at risk for pressure ulcers) providing statistical results that consistently support the recommendation. (Level 2, 3, 4, 5 studies) C The recommendation is supported by indirect evidence (e.g., studies in healthy humans, humans with other types of chronic wounds, animal models) and/or expert opinion Strengths of Recommendation  Strong positive recommendation: definitely do it  Weak positive recommendation: probably do it  No specific recommendation  Weak negative recommendation: probably don’t do it  Strong negative recommendation: definitely don’t it

Clinical guidelines: grading the evidence behind the practice

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of central venous catheter for critically ill patients

Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery Clinical Practice Guideline Development Scheme: An Overview of Evidence Quality Assessment Methods, Evidence to Decision Frameworks, and Reporting Standards in Guideline Development

GRADE pearls and pitfalls—Part 2: Clinical practice guidelines

CME CLINICAL COMMENTARY REVIEW: Patient Centered Practice Guidelines: GRADEing Evidence to Incorporate Certainty, Balance Between Benefits and Harms, Equity, Feasibility, and Cost-Effectiveness

Appraising the quality standard of clinical practice guidelines related to central venous catheter-related thrombosis prevention: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines

Guidelines in Neurosurgery: a critical appraisal

A pragmatic approach to selecting a grading system for clinical practice recommendations in palliative care

Evidence-Based Nursing based on Clinical Practice Guideline：practice and reflection

Development and Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines: An Update and Synthesis of the Literature With a Focus in Application to Spinal Conditions

Methods for Developing Neuroscience Nursing Clinical Practice Guidelines

Quality of Critical Care Clinical Practice Guidelines: Assessment with AGREE II Instrument.

The 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society clinical practice guidelines for the management of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Part II: Endorsed by the Society of Interventional Radiology and the Society for Vascular Medicine

Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers : Clinical Practice Guideline

Adaptation of evidence-based nursing practice guideline for central venous-port management

Systematic Review of Guidelines for the Management of Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Prophylaxis of Venous Thrombosis in Neurocritical Care Patients: An Evidence-Based Guideline: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society

An Overview of the Methodology Used to Develop Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Acute and Intraoperative Spinal Cord Injury

Standardizing Best Nursing Practice for Implanted Ports: Applying Evidence-based Professional Guidelines to Prevent Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections

From guidelines to clinical practice in care for ischaemic stroke patients: A systematic review and expert opinion

Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for the management of Dysphagia after acute stroke