Abstract:How students achieve in science tests has a major bearing on appraisals of their overall competence in science—and has implications for their post-school science choices and pathways. There may be some factors that are implicated in their achievement in these tests and which are important to understand when interpreting test results and appraise students' overall science performance. This study investigated real-time perceived science competence (via self-efficacy) as one such factor. In the present study, N = 160 high school students reflected on and rated their self-efficacy in science midway through a science test. Using structural equation modeling, and drawing on theorizing around the longitudinal associations between motivation and achievement as well as literature on testing effects, the study examined the extent to which performance in the first half of the test was associated with mid-test self-efficacy (the so-called "skill-development" phenomenon), the extent to which self-efficacy was associated with performance in the second half of the test ("self-enhancement"), and the extent to which performance in the first half of the test was linked to performance in the second half of the test ("self-sustaining"). Support was found for all three associations: (a) prior performance was significantly and positively associated with mid-test self-efficacy (skill-development), (b) prior performance was significantly and positively associated with subsequent performance (self-sustaining), and (c) mid-test self-efficacy was significantly and positively associated with subsequent performance (self-enhancement). It is thus evident there are real-time competence perceptions and achievement relationships occurring during a science test. By better understanding these relationships, science educators are in a stronger position to enhance and sustain high school students' science motivation and performance, particularly when they do science tests.

Impact of Computer-Based Assessments on the Science's Ranks of Secondary Students

Computer-based and paper-and-pencil tests: A study in calculus for STEM majors

Comparing Test-Taking Effort Between Paper-Based and Computer-Based Tests

Participation and performance on paper- and computer-based low-stakes assessments

Scoring and Consequential Validity Evidence of Computer- and Paper-Based Writing Tests in Times of Change

Moving a formative test from a paper-based to a computer-based format. A student viewpoint

Does Medical Students' Preference of Test Format (Computer-based vs. Paper-based) have an Influence on Performance?

The Analysis Of Examination Scores

Examining mode effects for an adapted Chinese critical thinking assessment

Evaluating Students' Science Notebooks As An Assessment Tool

What happens when students reflect on their self-efficacy during a test? Exploring test experience and test outcome in science

Gender Differences Under Test Pressure and Their Impact on Academic Performance: A Quasi-Experimental Design

Performance differences for in-class and online administration of low-stakes research-based assessments

Comparative Study on Validity of Paper-Based Test and Computer-Based Test in the Context of Educational and Psychological Assessment among Arab Students

The importance of test order in external and standardized test results: The case of PISA 2018

A Comparison of Computer-Assisted Instruction and the Traditional Method of Teaching Basic Statistics

Evaluating the Efficacy of Online Assessments in Higher Education

Candidates undertaking (invigilated) assessment online show no differences in performance compared to those undertaking assessment offline

Preferences and Scores of Different Types of Exams during COVID-19 Pandemic in Faculty of Veterinary Medicine in Spain: A Cross-Sectional Study of Paper and E-exams

Comparing the Impacts of a Problem-Based Computer-Assisted Instruction and the Direct-Interactive Teaching Method on Student Science Achievement