Associations between cannabis policies and state-level specialty cannabis use disorder treatment in the United States, 2004-2019
Pia M. Mauro,Sarah Gutkind,Melanie S. Askari,Deborah S. Hasin,Hillary Samples,Christine M. Mauro,Erin M. Annunziato,Anne E. Boustead,Silvia S. Martins
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111113
IF: 4.852
2024-02-04
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Abstract:Background Cannabis use disorder (CUD) treatment prevalence decreased in the US between 2002-2019, yet structural mechanisms for this decrease are poorly understood. We tested associations between cannabis laws becoming effective and self-reported CUD treatment. Methods Restricted-use 2004-2019 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health included people ages 12+ classified as needing CUD treatment (i.e., past-year DSM-5-proxy CUD or last/current specialty treatment for cannabis). Time-varying indicators of medical cannabis laws (MCL) with/without cannabis dispensary provisions differentiated state-years before/after laws using effective dates. Multi-level logistic regressions with random state intercepts estimated individual- and state-adjusted CUD treatment odds by MCLs and model-based changes in specialty CUD treatment state-level prevalence. Sensitivity analyses tested associations between CUD treatment and MCL or recreational cannabis laws (RCL). Results Using a broad treatment need sample definition in 2004-2014, specialty CUD treatment prevalence decreased by 1.35 (95% CI=-2.51, -0.18) points after MCL without dispensaries and by 2.15 points (95% CI=-3.29, -1.00) after MCL with dispensaries provisions became effective, compared to before MCL. Among people with CUD in 2004-2014, specialty treatment decreased only in MCL states with dispensary provisions (aPD=-0.91, 95% CI=-1.68, -0.13). MCLs were not associated with CUD treatment use in 2015-2019. In sensitivity analyses, RCL were not associated with CUD treatment among people with CUD. Conclusions Policy-related reductions in specialty CUD treatment were concentrated in states with cannabis dispensary provisions in 2004-2014, but not 2015-2019, and partly driven by reductions among people without past-year CUD. Other mechanisms (e.g., problem identification, criminal-legal referrals) could contribute to decreasing treatment trends.
psychiatry,substance abuse