Disparities in access but not outcomes: Medicaid versus non-Medicaid patients in multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation

Taylor B. Crouch,Sharlene Wedin,Rebecca Kilpatrick,Allison Smith,Brigette Flores,Julia Rodes,Jeffrey Borckardt,Kelly Barth
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2321326
2024-02-29
Disability and Rehabilitation
Abstract:Purpose: There are known disparities in chronic pain severity, treatment, and opioid-related risks amongst individuals from lower socioeconomic status, including Medicaid beneficiaries, but little is known about whether Medicaid beneficiaries benefit in a similar way from multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation. This study investigated differences in clinical outcomes between Medicaid and non-Medicaid beneficiaries who completed a 3-week multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program. Methods: Participants ( N = 131) completed a broad range of clinical measures pre- and post-treatment including pain severity, pain interference, depression, anxiety, objective physical functioning, and opioid misuse risk. Patients with Medicaid were compared with non-Medicaid patients in terms of baseline characteristics and rate of change, utilizing two-factor repeated measures analyses of variance. Results: There were baseline characteristic differences, with Medicaid beneficiaries being more likely to be African American, have higher rates of pain, worse physical functioning, and lower rates of opioid use. Despite baseline differences, both groups demonstrated significantly improved outcomes across all measures ( p <.001) and no significant difference in rate of improvement. Conclusions: Results suggest that pain rehabilitation is as effective for Medicaid recipients as non-Medicaid recipients. Patients with Medicaid are particularly vulnerable to disparities in treatment, so efforts to expand access to multidisciplinary pain treatments are warranted.
rehabilitation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?