Abstract:The widely used quasi-isentropic ramp loading technique relies heavily on back-calculation methods that convert the measured free-surface velocity profiles to the stress–density states inside the compressed sample. Existing back-calculation methods are based on one-dimensional isentropic hydrodynamic equations, which assume a well-defined functional relationship P(ρ) between the longitudinal stress and density throughout the entire flow field. However, this kind of idealized stress–density relation does not hold in general, because of the complexities introduced by structural phase transitions and/or elastic–plastic response. How and to what extent these standard back-calculation methods may be affected by such inherent complexities is still an unsettled question. Here, we present a close examination using large-scale molecular dynamics (MD) simulations that include the detailed physics of the irreversibly compressed solid samples. We back-calculate the stress–density relation from the MD-simulated rear surface velocity profiles and compare it directly against the stress–density trajectories measured from the MD simulation itself. Deviations exist in the cases studied here, and these turn out to be related to the irreversibility between compression and release. Rarefaction and compression waves are observed to propagate with different sound velocities in some parts of the flow field, violating the basic assumption of isentropic hydrodynamic models and thus leading to systematic back-calculation errors. In particular, the step-like feature of the P(ρ) curve corresponding to phase transition may be completely missed owing to these errors. This kind of mismatch between inherent properties of matter and the basic assumptions of isentropic hydrodynamics has a fundamental influence on how the ramp loading method can be applied.

Flow curve approximation using Avitzur's model for barreling compression test

A Friction Evaluation Method Based on Barrel Compression Test

Experimental Methodology for Obtaining the Flow Curve of Sheet Materials in a Wide Range of Strains

Simulations of Interaction Between Flow and a Thin Elastic Beam Using Cip-Based Model with Adaptive Mesh

Enhancing Axisymmetric Compression Testing: Modeling and Addressing Flow Curve Errors

Determination of Assumed Strain Hardening Relationship from Shear-Compression Model and Data Analysis

Correction of the Metallic Material Flow Curves

Determination of Flow Curve and Plastic Anisotropy of Medium-Thick Metal Plate: Experiments and Inverse Analysis

Accurate Flow Characterization of A6082 for Precision Simulation of a Hot Metal Forming Process

Two new mathematical models to predict the flow stress at hot deformation

Friction correction of flow stress-strain curve in the upsetting process

Modeling of Flow Characteristics in 3D Rough Rock Fracture with Geometry Changes under Confining Stresses

Inverse Analysis and Selection of Flow Curve Model for Medium-Thick Plate

Determination of dynamic flow stress equation based on discrete experimental data: Part 1 Methodology and the dependence of dynamic flow stress on strain-rate

A General Autofrettage Model of a Thick-Walled Cylinder Based on Tensile-Compressive Stress-Strain Curve of a Material

Fundamental Influence of Irreversible Stress–strain Properties in Solids on the Validity of the Ramp Loading Method

Test-and-FE-based method for obtaining complete stress-strain curves of structural steels including fracture

Evaluation of Anisotropic Constitutive Models: Mixed Anisotropic Hardening and Non-Associated Flow Rule Approach

Empirical modelling of 2205 DSS flow curves using strain-compensated Arrhenius rate-type constitutive model

Prediction of Flow Stress Behavior of 70Cr3Mo Back-Up Roll Steel Using Modified Zerilli-Armstrong Model

An Efficient Computational Model for Simulating Stress-dependent Flow in Three-dimensional Discrete Fracture Networks