Light Streak Photometry and Streaktools

Joshua Goodeve

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.08443

2023-11-15

Abstract:Context. The accuracy of photometric calibration has gradually become a limiting factor in various fields of astronomy, limiting the scientific output of a host of research. Calibration using artificial light sources in low earth orbit remains largely unexplored. Aims. We aim to demonstrate that photometric calibration using light sources in low earth orbit is a viable and competitive alternative/complement to current calibration techniques, and explore the associated ideas and basic theory. Methods. We present the publicly-available Python code Streaktools as a means to simulate and perform photometric calibration using real and simulated light streaks. We use Streaktools to perform `pill' aperture photometry on 131 simulated streaks, and MCMC-based PSF model-fitting photometry on 425 simulated streaks in an attempt to recover the magnitude zeropoint of a real exposure of the DECam instrument on the Blanco 4m telescope. Results. We show that calibration using pill photometry is too inaccurate to be useful, but that PSF photometry is able to produce unbiased and accurate ($1\sigma$ error = 3.4mmag) estimates of the zeropoint of a real image in a realistic scenario, with a reasonable light source.

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How to use artificial light sources in low - Earth orbit (LEO) for accurate photometric calibration to replace or supplement existing calibration techniques**. Specifically, the author hopes to improve the accuracy of photometric calibration in astronomical observations by using LEO light sources such as satellites, and explore the feasibility and theoretical basis of this new method.

### Problem Background
With the remarkable progress of astronomical instruments in the past few decades, the accuracy of photometric calibration has gradually become a limiting factor in some fields of astronomy. Traditional photometric calibration methods rely on standard stars or quasars of known intensity, but these methods may not be accurate enough or difficult to achieve in some cases. Therefore, researchers have begun to explore new methods of photometric calibration using artificial light sources in LEO (such as satellites).

### Paper Objectives
The main objectives of the paper are:
1. **Prove that using artificial light sources in LEO for photometric calibration is a feasible and competitive alternative or supplement method**.
2. **Explore the theoretical and technical details related to this method**, including how to simulate and process the streaks generated by these light sources, and recover the magnitude zeropoint of the image from them.

### Methods
To achieve the above objectives, the author developed a Python toolkit named Streaktools for simulating and processing the streaks generated by LEO light sources. Specific methods include:
- **Simulating streaks**: Generate streaks by given satellite engineering parameters and positions.
- **Photometry**: Use two different photometric methods - pill aperture photometry and MCMC - based PSF model - fitting photometry to process these streaks.

### Results
Through the analysis of simulated data, the author draws the following conclusions:
- **Pill photometry is inaccurate**: For longer streaks, the results of pill photometry have a large deviation and cannot provide useful calibration information.
- **PSF model - fitting method is accurate**: The method based on PSF model fitting can produce unbiased and accurate magnitude zeropoint estimates, with an error of 1σ = 3.4 mmag, which indicates that this method has high feasibility in practical applications.

### Conclusions
The paper shows the potential of using artificial light sources in LEO for photometric calibration. Although the pill photometry method performs poorly, the method based on PSF model fitting performs well and can provide high - precision calibration results under reasonable conditions. Future research needs to further verify the practical application effects of this method and explore its performance in different situations.

### Summary of Key Formulas
1. **General expression for luminosity**:
\[
m=- 2.5\log_{10}\left(\frac{F}{F_{\text{ref}}}\right)+M_{\text{ref}}
\]
where \(F\) is the flux of the target object, \(F_{\text{ref}}\) is the flux of the reference object, and \(M_{\text{ref}}\) is the reference magnitude.

2. **Relationship between luminosity and count in CCD images**:
\[
m = - 2.5\log_{10}(C)+M_0
\]
where \(C\) is the received count and \(M_0\) is the magnitude zeropoint.

3. **Streak flux calculation**:
\[
F_{\text{meas}}=I\cdot S(\lambda_0)\cdot\frac{\Delta t}{T}
\]
where \(I\) is the irradiance, \(S(\lambda_0)\) is the band - pass rate, \(\Delta t\) is the pulse interval, and \(T\) is the exposure time.

4. **Magnitude zeropoint variance calculation**:
\[
\sigma^2_{M_0}=\left(\frac{2.5}{\ln 10}\right)^2\left[\left(\frac{